2014
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic dissection of the internal carotid artery: simultaneous infarct of optic nerve and brain

Abstract: Key Clinical MessageTraumatic intracranial internal carotid artery dissection is a rare but significant cause of stroke in patients in their forties, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous ischemic stroke and optic nerve infarction can occur. Clinical suspicion of dissection is determining in the acute management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to state that OM-CRAT in sliding and rotation has not posed risk to the circulation of such arteries and, according to some literature statements, osteopathic manipulative treatment or vertebral manipulation has not caused injury or undue tension on vertebral and carotid arteries 12,13,[20][21][22] , providing significantly lower sliding than that of clinical tests for VBI 9,10,13,20 . So, cervical manipulation performed by a professional was not in this study a risk factor for vertebrobasilar and carotid injury 12,13,[20][21][22][23] . Results of our study confirm that no individual has presented VBI or carotid failure by ultrasound before and after OM-CRAT, because there have been no significant oscillations on the flow of such arteries on CE-SE (Table 1) and on RCE-SE (Table 2), with results within normality indices 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to state that OM-CRAT in sliding and rotation has not posed risk to the circulation of such arteries and, according to some literature statements, osteopathic manipulative treatment or vertebral manipulation has not caused injury or undue tension on vertebral and carotid arteries 12,13,[20][21][22] , providing significantly lower sliding than that of clinical tests for VBI 9,10,13,20 . So, cervical manipulation performed by a professional was not in this study a risk factor for vertebrobasilar and carotid injury 12,13,[20][21][22][23] . Results of our study confirm that no individual has presented VBI or carotid failure by ultrasound before and after OM-CRAT, because there have been no significant oscillations on the flow of such arteries on CE-SE (Table 1) and on RCE-SE (Table 2), with results within normality indices 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It is described that VA dissection associated to cervical manipulation is uncommon, but it can be severe or fatal in some cases [17][18][19] . There are reports that cervical manipulation and mobilization do not pose risk to VA and carotids 13,[20][21][22] , and it is considered that vertebral and carotid arteries dissection or injury should be attributed to mechanical impact common during car accidents (whiplash) or to arterial diseases, being uncommon for cervical manipulation to generate such injury 13,19,21,23 . Vascular ultrasound is indicated to evaluate blood flow from internal carotid (ICA), vertebral (VA) and basilar (BA) arteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers concerning blunt head and/or neck trauma are described in Table 1 [71]. Some Authors described cases of TICAD related to sports practice, both in case of some kind of trauma or not [25,62,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site of ischaemic damage is used in the classification of ION as fundoscopic examination helps to delineate the site involved - anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (AION) if the initial fundic examination shows disc oedema, and posterior (retrobulbar) ischaemic optic neuropathy (PION) if there is no initial disc oedema but subsequent examination exhibits optic disc atrophy [ 14 ]. Giant cell arthritis and nonarterial ION make up 90% of the causes of ION while only 4% of ION occurs due to ICAD [ 12 , 15 ]. CRAO/BRAO can result from an occlusion or decrease in perfusion of the central retinal artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%