2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic renal injury: Five-year experience at a major trauma centre in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study from South Africa, a setting similar to the Indian LMIC context, demonstrated high nephrectomy rates of 40% for grade IV and 89% for grade V in predominantly blunt renal trauma [ 20 ]. Contrary to this, another South African study from a tertiary level major trauma centre utilising endovascular and endourological interventions for trauma management, demonstrated nephrectomy rates of 10.5% for grade IV and 25% for grade V patients with blunt renal trauma [ 21 ]. A genitourinary trauma study by the AAST demonstrated nephrectomy rates of 15% for grade IV and 62% for grade V [ 10 ], and a Canadian study by Mann et al demonstrated only a 4% nephrectomy rate for high-grade renal trauma [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study from South Africa, a setting similar to the Indian LMIC context, demonstrated high nephrectomy rates of 40% for grade IV and 89% for grade V in predominantly blunt renal trauma [ 20 ]. Contrary to this, another South African study from a tertiary level major trauma centre utilising endovascular and endourological interventions for trauma management, demonstrated nephrectomy rates of 10.5% for grade IV and 25% for grade V patients with blunt renal trauma [ 21 ]. A genitourinary trauma study by the AAST demonstrated nephrectomy rates of 15% for grade IV and 62% for grade V [ 10 ], and a Canadian study by Mann et al demonstrated only a 4% nephrectomy rate for high-grade renal trauma [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conservative management of patients with grade IV or V injuries who are hemodynamically unstable remains controversial [2]. In most high-grade renal injury cases, nephrectomy remains a possibility even though successful NOM is possible [10]. However, recent developments in imaging technology and in the available treatment options have decreased the need for surgical interventions, allowing kidney preservation in most cases [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical experience of mandatory laparotomies has been supplanted by selective non-operative management (NOM) based on clinical risk factors and advanced diagnostic imaging [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . While blunt renal trauma has long been managed conservatively with fantastic results, conservative management of penetrating trauma to the kidney has only more recently been explored [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . The candidacy for non-operative management, as well as the risk factors for failure, remain poorly de ned 7,13,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%