During World War I a recently developed dye method of measuring plasma volume (1) was employed, to a limited extent, in the investigation of hemorrhagic and traumatic shock in wounded soldiers. Those studies (2 to 4) showed that shock was associated with varying degrees of reduction in the measurable total blood volume. It was assumed that this reduction resulted in a decreased venous return to the heart, which accounted for diminished blood flow and death in vascular collapse. It was also felt that severity of shock as judged clinically was proportional to the degree of blood volume reduction. Cannon (5) summarized the results of these investigations in 1923. There was little change in this conception of the fundamentals of shock for several years, and, as might be expected, little improvement in the therapy of shock.Blalock(6) concluded that the decrease in blood pressure in experimental traumatic shock was due to loss of blood into damaged areas, or to hemorrhage into the intestinal tract (7). Moon (8) on the basis of pathological observations on dogs dying in prolonged shock (peritonitis) concluded that increase in capillary permeability permitting the leakage of plasma from the vascular bed was chiefly responsible for loss in blood volume. IThe As improvements in the original dye method of measuring plasma volume became available, (9 to 11), attention was again concentrated on blood volume in shock. It was shown (12) that surgical operations may be accompanied by a loss of plasma and red cells greater than can be accounted for by measured blood loss. A reduction in blood volume severe enough to produce severe peripheral vascular collapse was found to be brought about by the excessive sweating accompanying artificially induced fever (13). It was observed for the first time that shock produced in dogs by thermal burns was preceded by great reductions in circulating plasma volume (14,15).Hemoconcentration of blood in large vessels has been associated with shock, and was thought to be characteristic. Scudder (16) suggested that the determination of the specific gravity of whole blood and plasma might be useful as a guide to therapy.Interest in the hemodynamics of shock came into a renewed focus during the early years of World War II. An extensive historical review of our knowledge of shock was published by Harkins in 1941 (17) and a briefer summary of the known physiology of shock by Wiggers in 1942 (18).The many blood volume studies in experimental shock in animals (19) and of traumatic shock in man (20 to 22) carried out during the war have amply confirmed the early conception that severe oligemia is a constant characteristic of the condition.That significant leakage of plasma from capillaries whose permeability is increased in shock does not occur, has been clearly demonstrated by 126 RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES MEASURING BLOOD VOLUME IN SHOCK Fine and Seligman (23 to 25). The opinion has been expressed by Noble and Gregersen that the reduction in blood volume is due to loss of whole blood at the site of injury...