2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.039
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic skull fractures in children and adolescents: A retrospective observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Different countries with different culture, and daily activities presented with different patterns of fractures. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Some specific fracture sites had an increasing incidence in pediatric patients, 9,10 but data on the patterns and epidemiologic trends of traumatic facial fractures in China are scarce. Compared with facial fractures occurring in adults, traumatic facial fractures in children and adolescents are relatively uncommon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Different countries with different culture, and daily activities presented with different patterns of fractures. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Some specific fracture sites had an increasing incidence in pediatric patients, 9,10 but data on the patterns and epidemiologic trends of traumatic facial fractures in China are scarce. Compared with facial fractures occurring in adults, traumatic facial fractures in children and adolescents are relatively uncommon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2) In this respect, 4% of all patients with severe head injuries suffer from BSF, accounting for 19–21% of skull fractures. 7) The incidence of these fractures was 3.5–24% in Asian studies, while previous studies in Nigeria indicated a higher incidence of 33–46%. 9) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The high prevalence of skull, orbital, and midface fractures in the ICU group are likely due to the high-impact mechanism of injury documented in patients presenting with these fractures. [10][11][12][13] Conversely, the lower proportion of mandibular fracture patients admitted to the ICU may be due to anatomic factors, such as location lower in the face and wide range of presentations (eg, isolated condylar fracture vs bilaterally displaced ramus fractures). While patients with mandibular fractures had high rates of musculoskeletal (44.7%), respiratory (36.2%), dental (25.5%), and ophthalmologic injuries (23.4%), they may have a wider range of severity, with less severe mandibular fractures occurring more frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%