1992
DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90049-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel exposure and choice of comparison crashes for examining motorcycle conspicuity by analysis of crash data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Broader analysis of our data also demonstrates that the average number of bony injuries sustained is greater in multiple vehicle crashes. This finding is in keeping with the increased crash risk associated with riding among other vehicles shown by Cercarelli et al 6 . and in keeping with the greater injury severity/mortality in multivehicle crashes shown by Whittington 7 and Meuleners et al 5 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Broader analysis of our data also demonstrates that the average number of bony injuries sustained is greater in multiple vehicle crashes. This finding is in keeping with the increased crash risk associated with riding among other vehicles shown by Cercarelli et al 6 . and in keeping with the greater injury severity/mortality in multivehicle crashes shown by Whittington 7 and Meuleners et al 5 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Low motorcycle conspicuity, or the inability of the motorcyclist to be seen by other road users, is considered an important factor associated with the risk of motorcycle crashes (Cercarelli et al, 1992;Williams and Hoffmann, 1979;Wulf et al, 1989). Previous work suggests that inexpensive measures, such as wearing reflective or fluorescent clothing, and using headlights in daytime could reduce motorcycle fatalities and serious injuries (Muller, 1984;Rumar, 1980;Thomson, 1980;Wells et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cercarelli et al (1992) produce evidence from accident database studies to suggest that many crashes between cars can be interpreted as LBFS errors. The explanation of collisions purely in terms of sensory conspicuity problems does not therefore seem likely to provide a complete explanation of this type of accident (Olson 1989;Wulf et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%