1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00951.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel‐Time Constraints on Destination‐Choice Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Space-time constrained destination choice modeling is of particular importance to market analysts, location analysts, and transportation planners who predict the share in alternatives by discrete choice models (Thill and Horowitz, 1997a). In the future, more constraints can be imposed on the universal choice set to define a more restrictive and realistic choice set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Space-time constrained destination choice modeling is of particular importance to market analysts, location analysts, and transportation planners who predict the share in alternatives by discrete choice models (Thill and Horowitz, 1997a). In the future, more constraints can be imposed on the universal choice set to define a more restrictive and realistic choice set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available individual choice sets vary from person to person, depending on the objective built environment and the subjective personal perception/preference (Ben-Akiva and Boccara, 1995). The idea of the two-stage discrete choice model has been adopted by transportation studies ranging from mode choice to residential location choice to accessibility assessment (e.g., BenAkiva and Boccara, 1995;Cascetta et al, 2007;Gliebe and Koppelman, 2005;Pellegrini et al, 1997;Swait and Ben-Akiva, 1987;Thill and Horowitz, 1997a;Zhang, 2006). A universally generated choice set that does not reflect variations in individuals' alternatives is a form of choice set misspecification that can lead to inconsistent parameter estimates (Williams and Ortúzar, 1982).…”
Section: Probabilistic Choice Rule and Constrained Choice Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses that demonstrate how the misspecification of choice sets may produce misleading parameter estimates and predictions can be found in Thill (1992), Pellegrini, Fotheringham, and Lin (1997), and Thill and Horowitz (1997). Many of the spatial interaction studies dealing explicitly with the problem of restricted choice sets are along lines suggested by Manski (1977), with a probabilistic choice set generation.…”
Section: The Gravity Modeling Tradition Of Spatial Interaction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random-constraints models (Swait andBen-Akiva 1987a, 1987b) use probabilistic constraints to derive a family of parametric choice set models. See also Boccara (1989) and Thill and Horowitz (1997).…”
Section: Approaches To Choice Set Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%