1979
DOI: 10.1029/jb084ib07p03615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel time inversion: A geometrical approach

Abstract: A geometric formulation of the seismic travel time problem is given based upon the use of slowness as an independent variable. Many of the difficulties in the conventional treatment (e.g., singular kernels) are thereby, avoided. Furthermore, it is shown that the inverse problem possesses an inherently linear formulation. In this formalism we are able to provide extremal solutions giving upper and lower depth bounds using linear programing. This approach has been compared with two well‐known nonlinear extremal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would suggest only minor influences of CMB structure on individual paths. V p model for the outermost core τ − p inversion: effects of starting model KH2013 built a V p model of the topmost 700 km of the outer core using differential SmKS travel time anomalies of several Fiji-Tonga events recorded at Europe, dt 3−2 , dt 4−3 , and dt 5−3 , to which a τ − p inversion method had been applied (Garmany et al 1979;HK2010;KH2013), with PREM as the starting model. The resultant model, KHOMC, has a 0.45 % slower V p than PREM at the CMB Array distances correspond to approximate array centers, whose accurate value do not affect the results.…”
Section: Array Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would suggest only minor influences of CMB structure on individual paths. V p model for the outermost core τ − p inversion: effects of starting model KH2013 built a V p model of the topmost 700 km of the outer core using differential SmKS travel time anomalies of several Fiji-Tonga events recorded at Europe, dt 3−2 , dt 4−3 , and dt 5−3 , to which a τ − p inversion method had been applied (Garmany et al 1979;HK2010;KH2013), with PREM as the starting model. The resultant model, KHOMC, has a 0.45 % slower V p than PREM at the CMB Array distances correspond to approximate array centers, whose accurate value do not affect the results.…”
Section: Array Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is reminiscent of the expression obtained by Garmany (1979) and Garmany et al (1979). The dependence on PI and P 2 is embedded in P 3' This mapping is simplest when Z is a single-valued function of P 3' For instance, this will be the case when the slowness surface shrinks with depth without changing its shape, as described by Garmany (I 988b) and Shearer .…”
Section: Delay Times and Radon Transform Synthesismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, for an undulating boundary there may be discontinuities in w(z), that is for small changes in the angle the x position of the boundary may change abruptly. This is much like the situation in traveltime inversion using the tau method (Bessonova et al 1974(Bessonova et al , 1976Garmany et al 1979). These discontinuities are also the source of non-uniqueness for the inverse problem, somewhat akin to low-velocity zones in traveltime inversion.…”
Section: Inversion Of Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 93%