2020
DOI: 10.1177/2372732220942250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treat Sexual Stigma to Heal Health Disparities: Improving Sexual Minorities’ Health Outcomes

Abstract: Despite recent strides toward equality in the United States, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people continue to report experiences of sexual stigma and psychological and physical health problems. This article reviews empirical evidence of sexual stigma and sexual orientation-based health disparities. The current framework proposes that sexual orientation does not cause health disparities; homophobic individuals and societies do. Social psychology, recognizing the power of the situation, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chronic health conditions, including cancer, obesity, and diabetes, disproportionately affect individuals from minoritized and marginalized backgrounds (Braveman, 2006) due to structural inequities (i.e., unequal distribution of societal power, privilege, and resources) that underlie the social conditions in which individuals are born, grow, live, work, and age (Baciu et al, 2017). Rooted in unequal social, economic, and environmental conditions and manifested in social oppression, health disparities are socially determined by intersecting, systemic influences such as racism and ethnic discrimination (O’Brien et al, 2020), socioeconomic disadvantage (Price et al, 2018), sexism and cissexism (Downing & Przedworski, 2018; Molix, 2014), homophobia and heterosexism (Matsick et al, 2020), and nativism and xenophobia (Vargas et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic health conditions, including cancer, obesity, and diabetes, disproportionately affect individuals from minoritized and marginalized backgrounds (Braveman, 2006) due to structural inequities (i.e., unequal distribution of societal power, privilege, and resources) that underlie the social conditions in which individuals are born, grow, live, work, and age (Baciu et al, 2017). Rooted in unequal social, economic, and environmental conditions and manifested in social oppression, health disparities are socially determined by intersecting, systemic influences such as racism and ethnic discrimination (O’Brien et al, 2020), socioeconomic disadvantage (Price et al, 2018), sexism and cissexism (Downing & Przedworski, 2018; Molix, 2014), homophobia and heterosexism (Matsick et al, 2020), and nativism and xenophobia (Vargas et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within South-Atlantic and East-South-Central counties, providers and resources were concentrated in metro areas; multiple non-metro counties in these areas were "resource deserts," in that they did not have any LGBTQ+ youth-inclusive providers. The stark differences in numbers of LGBTQ+ community providers between US regions highlight the geographic disparities in the availability of programs that can play important roles in reducing sexual minority stigma (both external and internalized) and improving outcomes in AGBMSM (Matsick et al, 2020). In the South-Atlantic region, 46% of analyzed counties did not have any identified LGBTQ+ community providers, and in the South-Central region, 85% of counties were similarly lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structural factors are malleable, and interventions aimed at reducing structural vulnerabilities and reducing disparities in relevant service availability may mediate negative health effects in AGBMSM (Matsick et al, 2020). Programs and interventions that create or expand health and well-being services tailored, or welcoming, to sexual minority youth can play a vital role in increasing AGBMSM's health (Coulter et al, 2019;Jadwin-Cakmak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…" -anonymous Grindr user, quoted by Arnold (2018) Lesbian women are twice as likely to be fat 1 than their heterosexual counterparts (e.g., Boehmer et al, 2007;Struble et al, 2010); the converse is true for gay men, who are less likely to be fat than heterosexual men (e.g., Fredricksen-Goldsen et al, 2013;Lunn et al, 2017). literature spanning psychology, public health, and LG (lesbian and gay) studies has interrogated these patterns through differing lenses -often drawing upon minority stress models -which position sexual stigma as a fundamental cause of health disparities (see Matsick et al, 2020) to understand these differential outcomes (e.g., Mereish, 2014;Mereish & Poteat, 2015). Much of this work has drawn connections to how LG community norms shape bodily attitudes; for example, academics have theorized that greater acceptance of bodily diversity in lesbian populations contributes to greater body satisfaction and thus lower drive for thinness (e.g., Aaron et al, 2001).…”
Section: Stereotype Application At the Intersection Of Body Shape Gen...mentioning
confidence: 99%