2021
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treat-to-Target in Atopic Dermatitis: An International Consensus on a Set of Core Decision Points for Systemic Therapies

Abstract: Currently no treat-to-target framework to guide systemic treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis exists. We sought to reach international consensus through an eDelphi process on a core set of recommendations for such an approach. Recommendations were developed by an international Steerng Committee, spanning 3 areas (Guiding Principles, Decision Making, and Outcome Thresholds) and 2 specific time-points; an initial acceptable target at 3 months and an optimal target at 6 months, each based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systemic non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS), including cyclosporin A (CsA), methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine, are frequently prescribed to treat severe AD refractory to topical therapy (EUROSTAD [10]; TREAT [11,12]); however, there is a lack of robust evidence from large, well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCT) to support their use, and their toxicity profile requires frequent laboratory monitoring, and long-term treatment is not recommended because of a poor benefit-risk profile [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Patients treated with these broad-spectrum NSISS can suffer relapses and substantial side effects, including nephrotoxicity, liver dysfunction, and an increased risk of infection and cancer, and they are contraindicated in many patients [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS), including cyclosporin A (CsA), methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine, are frequently prescribed to treat severe AD refractory to topical therapy (EUROSTAD [10]; TREAT [11,12]); however, there is a lack of robust evidence from large, well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCT) to support their use, and their toxicity profile requires frequent laboratory monitoring, and long-term treatment is not recommended because of a poor benefit-risk profile [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Patients treated with these broad-spectrum NSISS can suffer relapses and substantial side effects, including nephrotoxicity, liver dysfunction, and an increased risk of infection and cancer, and they are contraindicated in many patients [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delphi surveys methods have previously been used to establish consensus regarding specific treatment guidelines within the field of dermatology. [24][25][26] Delphi surveys consist of a series of questionnaires in which respondents are asked to provide their level of agreement with specific items or statements. Each subsequent survey then builds off of the results from the previous round in the survey to either eliminate, refine, or retain the items in question.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An international treat-to-target clinical approach for AD was recently published, which recommended patient evaluation at 3 and 6 months for initial and optimal disease control targets, respectively [ 12 ]. Briefly, treatment continuation should be considered for patients who achieve benchmarks in both patient self-reported global assessment (PtGA) and at least one disease domain (EASI, SCORAD, NRS, DLQI or POEM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%