1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb00769.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating erectile dysfunction with a vacuum tumescence device: a retrospective analysis of acceptance and satisfaction

Abstract: These results suggest that the vacuum device is an effective and safe treatment for impotence of various aetiologies, especially for those patients with arteriogenic impotence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For those with arteriogenic ED, VCD therapy achieved the efficacy and satisfaction rates of 67 and 84%, respectively. 37 For the corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction ED, Kolettis et al 38 reported a 56% satisfaction rate. For diabetic ED, Arauz-Pacheco et al 41 and Bodansky et al 42 reported successful rates of 75 and 58%, respectively.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For those with arteriogenic ED, VCD therapy achieved the efficacy and satisfaction rates of 67 and 84%, respectively. 37 For the corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction ED, Kolettis et al 38 reported a 56% satisfaction rate. For diabetic ED, Arauz-Pacheco et al 41 and Bodansky et al 42 reported successful rates of 75 and 58%, respectively.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common side effects include numbness, pain, penile bruising or petechiae. 9,32,37,[44][45][46] Due to the constriction rings, painful ejaculation or sensation of trapped ejaculate has also been commonly reported. 7,9 Other rare complications such as leg spasms, testicular migration, urethral varicosities/bleeding have been reported.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many are disconcerted by either the pivoting nature of the erection or suffer sideeffects such as bruising and pain at the site of the constricting rubber ring and penile ischaemia and coldness (Baltaci et al, 1995;Turner et al, 1990;Gilbert & Gingell, 1992;Bosshardt et al, 1995;Soderdahl et al, 1997). The cost of the appliance for the user is a further disadvantage.…”
Section: External Vacuum Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les raisons le plus souvent invoqu~es par les patients pour refuser ou abandonner l'~recteur sont non seulem e n t la gu~rison ou l'inefficacit6 du syst~me, mais 6galement les effets secondaires, des problames techniques, le refus de la partenaire, des probl~mes conjugaux, le rejet du syst~me en raison de son aspect i n s t r u m e n t a l encombrant et du m a n q u e de naturel, enfin son cofit excessif [1,4,8,9,13,16,21,25].…”
Section: A B a N D O N S (Tableau 3)unclassified
“…c) Blocage de rdjaculation [1,4,21,24] I1 survient chez 20 ~ 40 % des patients avec parfois des douleurs par distension de l'ur6tre bulbaire [27].…”
Section: B) Pdtdehies Contusions Eutandes Et Eeehymoses [4 9 21 27]unclassified