2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41018-020-00070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating implicit trauma: a quasi-experimental study comparing the EMDR Therapy Standard Protocol with a ‘Blind 2 Therapist’ version within a trauma capacity building project in Northern Iraq

Abstract: Psychological trauma is a silent epidemic which presents as a global public health issue, often in the form of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy is an empirically supported treatment intervention for PTSD and has been used as part of trauma-capacity building, particularly in lowand middle-income countries (LMIC). For some survivor's, their trauma experiences cannot be spoken of: they may be alluded to, suggested and though not directly expressed.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underpinned by the EMDR group approach (EMDR‐IGTP, Jarero et al 1999), an early trauma intervention protocol, Fast Feet Forward (FFF), was developed by these authors to support unaccompanied asylum‐seeking children. Table 1 highlights how FFF differed from the standard EMDR protocol and the EMDR blind to therapist protocol (B2T; Farrell et al., 2020). Differences between the FFF protocol and EMDR include the following: Therapists did not ask about trauma memories as they were still present, and doing so would create distrust, feelings of uncertainty and questions around safety given the immigration status of the young people. The protocol draws on sports psychology thinking which presents techniques that feel less clinical and more manageable for young people to use when therapeutic support is absent. The presence of therapeutic involvement throughout the protocol to help normalise the experience of doing the FFF running and footwork and to be alongside the young people in their doing. The use of five phases compared to the standard and group protocol which draws on an 8‐phase methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Underpinned by the EMDR group approach (EMDR‐IGTP, Jarero et al 1999), an early trauma intervention protocol, Fast Feet Forward (FFF), was developed by these authors to support unaccompanied asylum‐seeking children. Table 1 highlights how FFF differed from the standard EMDR protocol and the EMDR blind to therapist protocol (B2T; Farrell et al., 2020). Differences between the FFF protocol and EMDR include the following: Therapists did not ask about trauma memories as they were still present, and doing so would create distrust, feelings of uncertainty and questions around safety given the immigration status of the young people. The protocol draws on sports psychology thinking which presents techniques that feel less clinical and more manageable for young people to use when therapeutic support is absent. The presence of therapeutic involvement throughout the protocol to help normalise the experience of doing the FFF running and footwork and to be alongside the young people in their doing. The use of five phases compared to the standard and group protocol which draws on an 8‐phase methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underpinned by the EMDR group approach (EMDR-IGTP, Jarero et al 1999), an early trauma intervention protocol, Fast Feet Forward (FFF), was developed by these authors to support unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. Table 1 highlights how FFF differed from the standard EMDR protocol and the EMDR blind to therapist protocol (B2T; Farrell et al, 2020). Differences between the FFF protocol and EMDR include the following:…”
Section: Group Treatment Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several distinct barriers toward the equitable provision and access to evidence-based, face-to-face/in-person psychological treatments, with a paucity of suitably qualified mental health workers to sufficiently address the global burden of mental illness and psychological trauma ( Farrell et al, 2020 ). With relatively few providers trained in the therapies underpinned by a solid empirical evidence base, those who live in rural or remote communities are further restricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the differences between fast feet forward and the standard EMDR protocol, and the EMDR blind to therapist protocol (B2T; Farrell et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%