Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Aim. To evaluate the relationship of various factors with adherence to therapy in cardiovascular patients after a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Material and methods. The study included 284 patients (inpatients — 176, outpatients — 108) with cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation) after COVID-19. We collected data on cardiovascular history, made a questionnaire survey about COVID-19 course (symptoms, their severity, self-assessment of the disease severity). Paraclinical diagnostic investigations were carried out. In addition, 1, 3, 6 months after recovery, all respondents were invited for examination, laboratory tests, and survey using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Cardiovascular therapy adherence was assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months after recovery and adherence to COVID-19 treatment 1 month after inclusion in the study by comparing the compliance of the drugs prescribed at discharge with its actual use.Results. In total, 212 respondents continued study participation after 1 month, while 64,2% were adherent to cardiovascular therapy and 56,6% — to COVID-19 therapy. Compliance at 3 and 6 months was 60,4% (n=212) and 52,8% (n=188), respectively. A moderate correlation was found between adherence to treatment and the persistence of apprehension 1 month after recovery (r=0,33, p<0,05), moderate or severe weakness during disease (r=0,31, p<0,05), COVID-19 severity (r=0,39, p<0,05). Inhospital respondents with lung tissue involvement >25% (n=64, 36,4%) were more adherent to standard cardiovascular therapy, prescribed in accordance with clinical guidelines (r=0,336, p<0,05). Adverse events in the form of a hypertensive crisis, arrhythmias, decompensated HF 1, 3, 6 months after recovery significantly increased the compliance with medical recommendations (p<0,05). Medication adherence regarding COVID-19 was associated with the disease severity, HF history, apprehension and anxiety, weakness, and decreased exercise tolerance (p<0,05).Conclusion. After 1 month, adherence to cardiovascular and COVID-19 therapy did not differ significantly (p>0,05). Compliance after 1, 3, 6 months was positively influenced by COVID-19 severity, the subjective feeling of weakness, apprehension and anxiety during disease and the persistence of a subjective feeling of anxiety after recovery. Adverse events (hypertensive crisis, arrhythmia, decompensated HF) during 1, 3 and 6 months after COVID-19 significantly (p<0,05) increased adherence to treatment.
Aim. To evaluate the relationship of various factors with adherence to therapy in cardiovascular patients after a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Material and methods. The study included 284 patients (inpatients — 176, outpatients — 108) with cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation) after COVID-19. We collected data on cardiovascular history, made a questionnaire survey about COVID-19 course (symptoms, their severity, self-assessment of the disease severity). Paraclinical diagnostic investigations were carried out. In addition, 1, 3, 6 months after recovery, all respondents were invited for examination, laboratory tests, and survey using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Cardiovascular therapy adherence was assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months after recovery and adherence to COVID-19 treatment 1 month after inclusion in the study by comparing the compliance of the drugs prescribed at discharge with its actual use.Results. In total, 212 respondents continued study participation after 1 month, while 64,2% were adherent to cardiovascular therapy and 56,6% — to COVID-19 therapy. Compliance at 3 and 6 months was 60,4% (n=212) and 52,8% (n=188), respectively. A moderate correlation was found between adherence to treatment and the persistence of apprehension 1 month after recovery (r=0,33, p<0,05), moderate or severe weakness during disease (r=0,31, p<0,05), COVID-19 severity (r=0,39, p<0,05). Inhospital respondents with lung tissue involvement >25% (n=64, 36,4%) were more adherent to standard cardiovascular therapy, prescribed in accordance with clinical guidelines (r=0,336, p<0,05). Adverse events in the form of a hypertensive crisis, arrhythmias, decompensated HF 1, 3, 6 months after recovery significantly increased the compliance with medical recommendations (p<0,05). Medication adherence regarding COVID-19 was associated with the disease severity, HF history, apprehension and anxiety, weakness, and decreased exercise tolerance (p<0,05).Conclusion. After 1 month, adherence to cardiovascular and COVID-19 therapy did not differ significantly (p>0,05). Compliance after 1, 3, 6 months was positively influenced by COVID-19 severity, the subjective feeling of weakness, apprehension and anxiety during disease and the persistence of a subjective feeling of anxiety after recovery. Adverse events (hypertensive crisis, arrhythmia, decompensated HF) during 1, 3 and 6 months after COVID-19 significantly (p<0,05) increased adherence to treatment.
The importance of high-quality randomized controlled trials cannot be overemphasized. Each such study attempts to answer a specific clinical question. To do this, it is necessary to determine in advance the indicator of achievement of a specific result for a certain period of time. This indicator is the endpoint (EP) of the study, i.e. one or another outcome of the disease or a change in the laboratory and functional characteristics. Its choice directly affects the intended design and sample size of the study. The article provides a classification and hierarchy of EPs (depending on the purpose), describes the features and limitations of the use of important clinical outcomes and surrogate indicators. The reasons why composite EPs are widely used in cardiology studies are described. Special attention should be paid to EP interpretation within secondary analysis, a positive result of which can only be assessed if a treatment effect is demonstrated in terms of the primary indicator of efficacy or safety. The current review is supplemented by clinical examples of cardiology studies.
Introduction. Myocardial damage characteristic of novel coronavirus infection is a confirmed risk factor for its severe course and high mortality. There are biomarkers of this condition correlating with an unfavorable prognosis for the patient. However, the information on the problem of myocardial damage in the available literature is not fully systematic. It concerns pathogenesis, differential diagnosis of its causes, routing of patients with acute coronary syndrome. All the above is very important for choosing the right tactics of examination and treatment of patients, who are often limited in time. Aim. To summarize the data available at the time of writing from domestic and foreign researchers on the problem of myocardial damage and its main causes (acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis, stress cardiomyopathy) in COVID-19. Materials and methods. This review summarizes the data from articles published over the past two years found in PubMed, Google Scholar and eLIBRARY. Results. The authors tried to form a generalized modern understanding of the causes and structure of cardiovascular pathology and risk factors of its destabilization in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, the markers of increased risk of COVID-infected heart and vascular diseases, the tactics of examination and treatment of this category of patients, routing individuals with acute coronary syndrome and its differential diagnosis with non-coronary heart diseases. The questions of organization and availability of the medical care in the conditions of the pandemic and social aspects of the world cardiology problems in the current situation have been studied. Conclusion. Patients with cardiovascular disease have a more severe prognosis of the severity and outcome of COVID-19, which is explained by its pathogenesis. The group at highest risk of lethal events is composed of individuals with signs of myocardial damage, the causes of which are the above mentioned conditions. Their differential diagnosis is a difficult clinical task, which requires a systematic analysis of the dynamics of clinical syndromes and data of additional diagnostic methods from routine to the most modern (high-tech) and, of course, deep knowledge of the present problem. The correct determination of the cause of myocardial damage and the choice of the right patient’s route through the treatment network determines the effectiveness of treatment and, therefore, the prognosis of the patient’s life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.