1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70118-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment and postretention changes in dental arch width dimensions—a long-term evaluation of influencing cofactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
20

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
30
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Amid these approaches the arch expansion is most frequently advised but its stability has continuously been queried 26) . Such…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amid these approaches the arch expansion is most frequently advised but its stability has continuously been queried 26) . Such…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indices were based on mesiodistal incisors width was investigated on various populations around the globe with agreements and disagreements 19,21,22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . Aimed at the successful orthodontic treatment the tooth size discrepancy should be evaluated before treatment 32) as the tooth size and arch dimension has sexual disparities 17,32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Decreased arch width is associated with a reduction in arch depth: a 3-mm reduction in arch width is known to be equivalent to a 1-mm increase in overjet. 13 Furthermore, transverse arch correction is well known to be an unstable treatment modality, 25,26 and the arch-width reduction is more likely to be unstable without extractions and is most ineffective in the posterior region. 27 The importance of the transverse dental relationships between arch width and preexisting posterior tooth inclination are sometimes overlooked by orthodontists who are more concerned about surgical jaw repositioning and facial esthetics after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to other studies, they concluded that the enlargement of mandibular arch length in the mixed dentition showed a greater relapse tendency than other directions of treatment. Kahl-Nieke, Fischbach and Schwarze (1996) studied the casts of 226 cases from the University of Cologne Department of Orthodontics files at an average of 15.7 years out of treatment (sd = 4.4 years). 14% showed an upper arch width constriction of 2 mm or more whereas 24% showed a lower intercanine width decrease of more than 2 mm.…”
Section: Arch Form and Arch Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%