PsycEXTRA Dataset 1997
DOI: 10.1037/e495552006-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Effectiveness Score as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary study outcome was MA use as assessed via urine drug screens and secondary outcomes were treatment retention, depressive symptoms, MA cravings, and adverse events. The following aggregate measures of urine drug screen results were calculated: the Joint Probability Index at six and twelve weeks of treatment (the number of MA-metabolite free urine specimens submitted by participants in each treatment group at that time divided by the number of participants randomized to the treatment group) and the Treatment Effectiveness Score (the sum of the number of MA-free urine samples submitted per participant (Ling et al, 1997), the percentage of samples negative for MA overall, the longest consecutive period of MA abstinence, and the percentage of participants with at least 2 and at least 3 consecutive weeks of MA abstinence. Univariate comparisons of baseline demographic, drug use, and psychiatric characteristics of participants as well as comparisons of missing data rates, aggregate measures of urine drug screen results, medication adherence, and MA craving by treatment group assignment were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and chi square for categorical variables (Tabachnick and Fidell, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary study outcome was MA use as assessed via urine drug screens and secondary outcomes were treatment retention, depressive symptoms, MA cravings, and adverse events. The following aggregate measures of urine drug screen results were calculated: the Joint Probability Index at six and twelve weeks of treatment (the number of MA-metabolite free urine specimens submitted by participants in each treatment group at that time divided by the number of participants randomized to the treatment group) and the Treatment Effectiveness Score (the sum of the number of MA-free urine samples submitted per participant (Ling et al, 1997), the percentage of samples negative for MA overall, the longest consecutive period of MA abstinence, and the percentage of participants with at least 2 and at least 3 consecutive weeks of MA abstinence. Univariate comparisons of baseline demographic, drug use, and psychiatric characteristics of participants as well as comparisons of missing data rates, aggregate measures of urine drug screen results, medication adherence, and MA craving by treatment group assignment were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and chi square for categorical variables (Tabachnick and Fidell, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is the first to show an association between brain activation during drug cue exposure and vulnerability to both treatment dropout and relapse to cocaine use as assessed by the TES (Ling et al, 1997). Those CD patients with worse outcomes (eg relapsers with early dropout, more cocaine use, lower TES) had greater activation of sensory, Cocaine use (#days/mo) 20 (9) 21 (9) Cocaine use (#yrs) 4.7 (5) 7.9 (5) Alcohol (#days/mo) b 7 (7) 15 (9) Alcohol (#yrs) c 20 (6) 23 (4) Tobacco (pks/day) 0.6 (0.5) 0.8 (0.8)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects' fMRI responses were correlated with the TES and then used to compare nonrelapsers to relapsers (Ling et al, 1997). The TES score is the total number of cocaine-free urines provided by a subject during the outpatient portion of the study and ranged from 0 to 30, the best outcome.…”
Section: Functional Mri and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recent trials have attempted to deal with this problem using the Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES) as proposed by Ling and colleagues. 165 According to the TES, each patient is given a score from 0 to 100% calculated as number of negative (or positive) urine samples divided by the total number of possible urine samples that could have been taken. Missing urine samples (whether from patients retained in treatment or not retained in treatment) are assumed to be positive.…”
Section: Assessment Of Opioid Usementioning
confidence: 99%