2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment effects of two different appliances on pharyngeal airway space in mixed dentition Malay children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soft tissue profile is portrayed by chin prominence and thickness; facial profile angle and convexity; nose prominence and nasolabial angle; upper lip length, protrusion, and thickness; lower lip thickness, contour, and relation to the inferior sulcus [3,24,25,[27][28][29]. In our previous studies, craniofacial changes and changes in airway space of these two appliances were compared but detailed comparison of soft tissue changes is focused in this part [30,31]. The mean and standard deviation of pretreatment, posttreatment, and treatment changes values are presented in Tables 1-4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft tissue profile is portrayed by chin prominence and thickness; facial profile angle and convexity; nose prominence and nasolabial angle; upper lip length, protrusion, and thickness; lower lip thickness, contour, and relation to the inferior sulcus [3,24,25,[27][28][29]. In our previous studies, craniofacial changes and changes in airway space of these two appliances were compared but detailed comparison of soft tissue changes is focused in this part [30,31]. The mean and standard deviation of pretreatment, posttreatment, and treatment changes values are presented in Tables 1-4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear measurements were performed using Image J software (Rasband software, W.S., Image J, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ ). Many studies have applied McNamara method for assessment of upper airway, which can be divided into nasopharynx (upper pharynx) and oropharynx (lower pharynx) [ 17 19 ]. The upper pharyngeal width (UPW) was measured linearly from a point on the posterior wall of the soft palate to the posterior pharyngeal wall where there was the greatest closure of the airway.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%