Treatment Efficacy of Plasmapheresis Versus Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Management: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare and debilitating autoimmune disorder that affects the peripheral nervous system. Although the exact etiology of GBS is still unknown, it is thought to be triggered by a preceding gastrointestinal infection in most of the cases. Clinical manifestations include limb weakness, areflexia, and sensory loss that can further progress to neuromuscular paralysis affecting the respiratory, facial, and bulbar functions. Both plasmapheresis (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) have shown effectiveness in the treatment of GBS, but it is still unclear which treatment approach is superior in terms of therapeutic efficacy. This systematic review acts per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. For appropriate studies and research, we searched PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Screening of articles was performed based on relevance and inclusion and exclusion criteria. To check for bias, we used relevant quality appraisal tools. Initially, we found 2454 articles. After removing duplicates and irrelevant papers, we finalized 31 studies based on titles, abstracts, and reading entire articles. We excluded 14 studies because of poor quality; the remaining 17 papers were included in this review. IVIG is equally efficacious as PE in improving primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. IVIG showed a slight advantage over PE in reducing the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and hospital stay duration. However, in children, PE demonstrated a slight edge in improving secondary outcomes. PE was associated with a slightly higher risk of adverse events and post-treatment worsening symptoms compared to IVIG. IVIG is considered more user-friendly with a significantly lower patient discontinuation rate than PE. IVIG treatment was found to be significantly more expensive than PE.Categories: Neurology, Internal Medicine Keywords: guillain-barré syndrome (gbs), guillain-barre syndrome (gbs), ivig treatment, therapeutic plasma exchange (tpe), intravenous immunoglobulins (ivig), therapeutic plasmapheresis Review MethodsThis systematic review follows the guidelines and principles of the Preferred. Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 [10]. Search StrategyPubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Medical Literature Analysis, Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Science Direct, and Google Scholar were used exclusively as research databases and search engines to conduct this systemic review. The research utilizes GBS, PE, and IVIG. We used the Boolean terms "AND" and "OR" to combine the relevant concepts with specific keywords, as shown in Table 1.