Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470714362.ch20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment for Men with Intellectual Disabilities and Sexually Abusive Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research project involved a collaboration between nine participating sites, each offering cognitive‐behavioural treatment to men with intellectual disabilities who were at risk of sexual offending (some sites ran more than one group so 13 such groups were run altogether by the nine sites). The collaborative group which coordinated the treatment and research was known as Sex Offender Treatment Services Collaborative – Intellectual Disability (SOTSEC‐ID) – see http://www.kent.ac.uk/tizard/sotsec and Murphy & Sinclair (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This research project involved a collaboration between nine participating sites, each offering cognitive‐behavioural treatment to men with intellectual disabilities who were at risk of sexual offending (some sites ran more than one group so 13 such groups were run altogether by the nine sites). The collaborative group which coordinated the treatment and research was known as Sex Offender Treatment Services Collaborative – Intellectual Disability (SOTSEC‐ID) – see http://www.kent.ac.uk/tizard/sotsec and Murphy & Sinclair (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information was also collected on childhood history, previous offending, previous sexually abusive behaviour, sexually abusive behaviour during the group and for 6 months following the group. The rationale for selecting measures and details of the measures themselves are given elsewhere ; and in Murphy & Sinclair 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations