2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of acute perilunate dislocations: ORIF versus proximal row carpectomy

Abstract: III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is quite a low value when comparing to literature (reference values between 23 and 27). 10,20 Time to return to work was 5.00 months by mean. One of our patients was not able to resume previous job, as he was a heavy manual worker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is quite a low value when comparing to literature (reference values between 23 and 27). 10,20 Time to return to work was 5.00 months by mean. One of our patients was not able to resume previous job, as he was a heavy manual worker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 As definitive treatment, open anatomic reduction with fixation of fractures and ligamentous repair is usually advised for Mayfield stages I to III, 4,7 with a growing role for arthroscopic techniques. [9][10][11] Authors are frequently divided when referring to the best approach (dorsal alone 1,4 or a combination of dorsal and volar 12 ) and a multiplicity of different constructs on what concerns fractures fixation or ligamentous stabilization have been described. 4,[12][13][14] For Mayfield stage IV no standardized treatment exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the number of less than optimal results with ORIF, many authors have opted for salvage procedures as the primary operation, particularly in the setting of severe carpal trauma [ 12 ]. In a retrospective cohort analysis, Muller et al [ 1 ] compared ORIF against proximal row carpectomy (PRC) for the treatment of acute perilunate dislocations. In their study, 13 patients were treated by ORIF while 8 patients were treated by PRC with an average follow up of 35 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perilunate injuries are relatively rare, accounting for only 7% of pathologies to the carpus. However, a staggering number of these injuries are not diagnosed, with up to 25% of perilunate dislocations being missed on initial presentation [ 1 3 ]. The importance of identifying these injuries is highlighted by the significant complications produced by missed or improperly treated injuries including median nerve injury, chronic carpal instability, avascular necrosis of the mal-reduced lunate, complex regional pain syndrome, unreliable return of function, and posttraumatic arthrosis requiring a secondary procedure [ 2 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors presumed that ligament repair was absolutely necessary to maintain the reduction as well as the restoration of carpal alignment to optimize the outcome. Despite a number of successful cases that opted for closed reduction, percutaneous fixation or open reduction are ultimately required to maintain the reduction (13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%