1984
DOI: 10.1159/000269930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Chronic Colpo-Vaginitis by Stimulation of the Immune System

Abstract: We evaluated 100 patients with chronic colpo-vaginitis treated with the immunotherapeutic Gynatren/SolcoTrichovac. 44 patients suffered from ‘non-specific’ vaginitis, 42 were infected with Candida albicans and 14 with Chlamydia vaginalis. All patients had had several episodes of vaginal infections, some of them over several years, and 53 patients had current infection which, despite treatment with various drugs and remedies, had already persisted more than 2 months. The treatment consisted of 3 intramuscular i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the placebo group a total of 125 separate reinfec tions had to be treated, while in the immu nized group only 67 new infections ap peared. These figures, as far as they can in fact be compared with the earlier studies of Harris [9], Litschgi [14] and Verling [24] and in view of the differences in methodology, confirm the positive experience with this immunization therapy made earlier by these authors and by ourselves [4], It has to be borne in mind that the partners of the treated women were not investigated as to whether they had any transmissible infec tion, such as G. vaginalis, or not. Furthermore, as we had no information on sexual promis cuity, only speculation could be made on the risk of these women becoming re-infected by sexual contact.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, in the placebo group a total of 125 separate reinfec tions had to be treated, while in the immu nized group only 67 new infections ap peared. These figures, as far as they can in fact be compared with the earlier studies of Harris [9], Litschgi [14] and Verling [24] and in view of the differences in methodology, confirm the positive experience with this immunization therapy made earlier by these authors and by ourselves [4], It has to be borne in mind that the partners of the treated women were not investigated as to whether they had any transmissible infec tion, such as G. vaginalis, or not. Furthermore, as we had no information on sexual promis cuity, only speculation could be made on the risk of these women becoming re-infected by sexual contact.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%