2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00880-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of circulating CD34+ cells with SDF-1α or anti-CXCR4 antibody enhances migration and NOD/SCID repopulating potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies nevertheless show that the property governing the superior homing of MPB HPC to marrow is independent of accompanying mature leukocytes or of certain host conditions and lies within a cell population which is enriched for HPC. Although several studies have shown [45] or implied [46][47][48] the potential for superior marrow homing of MPB HPC, opposing views, showing similar [49] or even inferior [10] homing of MPB, have also been reported. Reasons for the discrepancies are not clear but may include insufficient sample size [49] and immunophenotypic instead of functional definition of HPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies nevertheless show that the property governing the superior homing of MPB HPC to marrow is independent of accompanying mature leukocytes or of certain host conditions and lies within a cell population which is enriched for HPC. Although several studies have shown [45] or implied [46][47][48] the potential for superior marrow homing of MPB HPC, opposing views, showing similar [49] or even inferior [10] homing of MPB, have also been reported. Reasons for the discrepancies are not clear but may include insufficient sample size [49] and immunophenotypic instead of functional definition of HPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Whether in vivo treatments with polyclonal antibodies versus different CXCR4 antagonistic molecules with potentially different modes of action could account for these differences is difficult to discern at this point and further experimentation is warranted. On a relevant vein, data with in vitro anti-CXCR4 antibody treatments are inconsistent [61][62][63][64] and at odds with studies using Ptx-treated cells in homing experiments of murine BM, 60 murine fetal liver cells, 65 or human CD34 ϩ cells. 62 Collectively, the weight of the evidence suggests that CXCR4/SDF-1 signaling may not be crucial for the initial anchoring of transplanted cells to endothelial cells within BM, but their subsequent retention within BM is greatly dependent on CXCR4/SDF-1 signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Brief exposure of mobilized human peripheral blood or peripheral blood CD34 þ cells to 100 ng/ml SDF-1 or to activating anti-CXCR4 antibody augmented their in vitro migration and NOD/SCID repopulating potential. 53 Taken together, the results strongly suggest that treatment of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with low concentrations of SDF-1 during the transduction process increases their engraftment potential as well. SDF-1 may thus have multifaceted benefits for cellular and gene therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%