2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of dairy wastewaters by electrocoagulation using mild steel electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(61 reference statements)
4
75
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The EC showed low removal efficiency of TS, VTS, FTS and FSS, on average 35.1; 39.3; 14.5 and 47.6% respectively. COD reduction was found to be significantly lower than previously reported by Tchamango et al (2010) and KUSHWAHA et al (2010) that used artificial wastewater l. It was obtained a removal efficiency of 57% of COD in this study, in contrast to the high value, 98%, obtained by SENGIL & OZACAR (2006) where the suspended solid content in effluent was high. In the study presented here, the effluent had a high concentration of dissolved solids, representing 80% of total solids.…”
Section: Wastewater Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The EC showed low removal efficiency of TS, VTS, FTS and FSS, on average 35.1; 39.3; 14.5 and 47.6% respectively. COD reduction was found to be significantly lower than previously reported by Tchamango et al (2010) and KUSHWAHA et al (2010) that used artificial wastewater l. It was obtained a removal efficiency of 57% of COD in this study, in contrast to the high value, 98%, obtained by SENGIL & OZACAR (2006) where the suspended solid content in effluent was high. In the study presented here, the effluent had a high concentration of dissolved solids, representing 80% of total solids.…”
Section: Wastewater Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The EC is a technology that has been effectively used to treat industrial wastewater containing different pollutants such as arsenic, phosphate, boron, dyes and viruses. Furthermore, it has been effective in breaking oil emulsions in water and treating paper mill effluent, olive mill effluent, landfill leachate and dairy effluent (Bensadok et al 2008;Irdemez et al 2006;Katal and Pahlavanzadeh 2011;Khoufi et al 2007;Li et al 2011;Azadi Aghdam et al 2015;Phalakornkule et al 2010;Sengil and Ozacar 2006;Tchamango et al 2010;Wan et al 2011;Yilmaz et al 2008;Zhu et al 2005;Amani-Ghadim et al 2013).…”
Section: Electrocoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, limited studies on the use of electrocoagulation were performed on livestock wastewater including swine (Bejan et al, 2007;Cho et al, 2010;Laridi et al, 2005;Rahman and Borhan, 2014), dairy (Bensadok et al, 2011;Şengil, 2006;Tchamango et al, 2010;Yavuz et al, 2011), slaughter house wastewater (Bazrafshan et al, 2012), industrial effluents (Ali and Yaakob, 2012;Basha et al, 2008), pharmaceutical wastewater (Yi-zhong et al, 2002), agroindustry and textile dye wastewater (Merzouk et al, 2009). However, until today, electrocoagulation was not use to treat feedlot runoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%