2004
DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200409000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures Using the Less Invasive Stabilization System

Abstract: Treatment of distal femur fractures with the LISS is associated with high union rates without autogenous bone grafting (93%), a low incidence of infection (3%), and maintenance of distal femoral fixation (100%). No loss of fixation in the distal femoral condyles was observed despite the treatment of 30 patients older than 65 years. The LISS is an acceptable surgical option for treatment of distal femoral fractures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
205
2
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
205
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, locking plate osteosynthesis has become widely accepted for treatment of periarticular fractures [1,3,9,14,16,17,24,27]. For relatively smaller distal tibia fracture fragments, especially with an average distance of 11 mm from the distal extent of the fracture to the tibial plafond in the current series, a monoaxial locking plate with fixedtrajectory locking screws sometimes may not provide anticipated fixation for the distal fragment [13,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, locking plate osteosynthesis has become widely accepted for treatment of periarticular fractures [1,3,9,14,16,17,24,27]. For relatively smaller distal tibia fracture fragments, especially with an average distance of 11 mm from the distal extent of the fracture to the tibial plafond in the current series, a monoaxial locking plate with fixedtrajectory locking screws sometimes may not provide anticipated fixation for the distal fragment [13,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade, retrograde intramedullary devices [20] as well as new generations of distal femur locked plating systems [9] have facilitated the operative treatment of these fractures. Clinically, locked plating systems are an established alternative to intramedullary nails [9,12,22]. However, 0% to 23% of patients will experience healing complications such as delayed union, hardware failures, and/or nonunion [10,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further when it is applied via a minimally invasive technique, it allows for prompt healing, lower rates of infection and reduced bone resorption as blood supply is preserved [9] . Internal fixation with locking plates creates a toggle free, fixed angle construct [10] . The introduction of plates with the option of locked screws has provided the means to increase the rigidity of fixation in osteoporotic bone or in the presence of periarticular or juxtaarticular fractures with a small epiphyseal segment [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal fixation with locking plates creates a toggle free, fixed angle construct [10] . The introduction of plates with the option of locked screws has provided the means to increase the rigidity of fixation in osteoporotic bone or in the presence of periarticular or juxtaarticular fractures with a small epiphyseal segment [10] . The implant offers multiple points of fixed-angle contact between the plate and screws in the distal part of femur, theoretically reducing the tendency for varus collapse that is seen with traditional lateral plates [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation