2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of elderly patients or patients who are performance status 2 (PS2) with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) translocations – Still a daily challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sictr, control siRNA; siCD44, CD44 siRNA; p, phosphorylated; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor. chemotherapy in EGFR wild-type NSCLC tumors remains poor (22). Cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic, is widely used for treatment of NSCLC patients, while both its cytotoxicity and effective dose are relatively high (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sictr, control siRNA; siCD44, CD44 siRNA; p, phosphorylated; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor. chemotherapy in EGFR wild-type NSCLC tumors remains poor (22). Cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic, is widely used for treatment of NSCLC patients, while both its cytotoxicity and effective dose are relatively high (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of several factors has been described as a possible reason for why medical oncologists offer PC to poor performance status patients. These factors include: (i) physicians overestimate prognosis of metastatic cancer patients [26]; (ii) limited evidenced-based treatment recommendations in this scenario [27]; (iii) patients’ and families’ expectations to receive anti-cancer therapy [23]; (iv) young or middle-aged patients [28]; (v) absence of palliative care team participating in the patients care [29]; and (vi) care at an academic/ teaching hospital [24]. Our cohort was composed mainly of treatment naïve patients who were admitted in an academic cancer center due to symptoms related to advanced solid tumor disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is a known negative prognostic factor for survival, its predictive significance with ICIs is less clear. Instinctively, as chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with PS2, one would want to extend the benefit to less toxic ICIs, and not undertreat these patients [6]. Unfortunately, data on the efficacy of ICIs in patients with PS2 are scant, stemming mainly from small trials, subgroup analyses or expanded access registries [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%