2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-002-0047-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Electroplating Industry Effluent Using Maize Cob Carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As(V) uptake increased with increase in contact time but remained constant after an equilibrium time for all the adsorbents studied. Similar results have been reported for the removal of arsenic and some metal ions (Senthilkumar 1998;Selvakumari et al 2002;Murugesan 2002). Equilibrium time varied with initial As(V) concentration and different adsorbent for As(V) removal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As(V) uptake increased with increase in contact time but remained constant after an equilibrium time for all the adsorbents studied. Similar results have been reported for the removal of arsenic and some metal ions (Senthilkumar 1998;Selvakumari et al 2002;Murugesan 2002). Equilibrium time varied with initial As(V) concentration and different adsorbent for As(V) removal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The maximum equilibrium time of respective adsorbent was considered for further studies, which was 170 min for live, autoclaved, alkali treated, formaldehyde treated, FeCl 3 treated and FeSO 4 treated adsorbent and 165 min for acid treated adsorbent. The equilibrium time required by the adsorbent to remove As(V) is very less when compared to other reported adsorbents (Selvakumari et al 2002). This result is interesting because equilibrium time is one of the important considerations for economical water and wastewater treatment applications (Sathishkumar et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…An adsorption capacity of ca. 52 mg g −1 was observed for nickel on pomegranate peel adsorbent at 25 • C. Adsorption capacities from the present study were compared with other adsorbents from previous studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and are shown in Table 2. It is evident that the prepared adsorbent shows comparable adsorption efficacy for nickel removal from water.…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Vijayaraghavan et al [21] reported an equilibrium time of around 200 min by polysulfoneimmobilized waste biomass of Corynebacterium glutamicum for nickel(II) removal from aqueous solutions, which is almost 10 times more than our result. Similarly, equilibrium was attained after 105 min in the use of carbonized maize cob and Aspergillus japonicus biomass for the removal of nickel(II) ions from electroplating industry effluent [2,36].…”
Section: Isotherm and Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these pollutants, metals are particularly harmful due to their non-biodegradable nature, toxicity and cost. Nickel use is widespread with industrial processes such as electroplating, plastics manufacturing, nickel-cadmium batteries, fertilizers, pigments, mining and metallurgical, porcelain enameling, copper sulfate manufacture and steam-electric power plants being the major contributors of nickel to the environment [1,2]. Nickel is reported as a potent carcinogen leading to cancer in the lungs, nose, stomach and bone [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%