2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cohort study of Dario et al,17 allocation to SCS or control study arms was made on the basis of the success of previous medical therapy ( Table 1). As a result, there was likely to be a major imbalance in the prognostic features of these two groups (i.e., medical failures are likely to be in those patients with more severe disease).…”
Section: Controlled Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cohort study of Dario et al,17 allocation to SCS or control study arms was made on the basis of the success of previous medical therapy ( Table 1). As a result, there was likely to be a major imbalance in the prognostic features of these two groups (i.e., medical failures are likely to be in those patients with more severe disease).…”
Section: Controlled Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple clinical studies have demonstrated the efficiency and safety of spinal cord stimulation in that indication [2,14]. Two types of leads can be used for the procedure: a surgical multicolumn paddle lead or a cylindrical percutaneous lead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of spinal cord stimulation in alleviating low back pain have been recognized in prior studies. (10)(11)(12), (14) Some have speculated that axial back pain has a considerable nociceptive component, which makes it less responsive to a SCS. (15) Although low back pain may be a universal complaint among patients with FBSS, the contribution of lower extremity neuropathic pain to disability in such patients must not be underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%