2001
DOI: 10.1121/1.1404436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of frequency-dependent admittance boundary conditions in transient acoustic finite/infinite-element models

Abstract: The paper addresses the handling of frequency-dependent, local admittance boundary conditions in acoustic transient finite/infinite-element models. The proposed approach avoids the evaluation of a convolution integral along the related boundary. Based on a similar technique developed in an aeroacoustic/finite difference context, the spatially local boundary condition is rewritten in a discrete form that involves normal accelerations and pressure time derivatives at the current time step and few steps before. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a positive reactance they made the choice of K = 0 (in our notation), and expressed p in v and v . For a negative reactance they took m = 0, used the split form (18), and expressed p in v and v . The causality condition of the impedance Z was correctly associated with the location of the pole at ω = 0, but the causality condition of the admittance Z −1 was called "stability" condition, which is confusing.…”
Section: A 3-parameter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a positive reactance they made the choice of K = 0 (in our notation), and expressed p in v and v . For a negative reactance they took m = 0, used the split form (18), and expressed p in v and v . The causality condition of the impedance Z was correctly associated with the location of the pole at ω = 0, but the causality condition of the admittance Z −1 was called "stability" condition, which is confusing.…”
Section: A 3-parameter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16,17] and [18] this form was used for N = 4 and M = 3, in [19] with N = M = 2, and in [20] with N = M = 2 and N = M = 4. Care is required that the zeros and poles are located in the correct part of the complex plane (i.e.…”
Section: B Rational Functions In ωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon also shows up in acoustic experiments 9 as well as in the pertaining Finite-Difference Time-Domain method ͑FDTD͒ and field emission microscopy Finite Element Method ͑FEM͒ studies. 10,11 A careful analysis of the structure of our reflection function shows, however, that this phenomenon is not in the same category as the Rayleigh wave 12 along the planar boundary of a traction free elastic solid, the Scholte wave 3 along the planar fluid/ solid interface, or the Stoneley waves 13 along the interface of two different solids. The analytic CdH method employed, further provides the changes in wave shape that the reflected wave undergoes, in their dependence on the parameters 14 occurring in the expression for the boundary's acoustic impedance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At this point, it is convenient to comment that the impedance of the vocal tract wall is not actually frequency independent (e.g., see Ishizaka et al, 1975). However, implementing frequency dependent boundary conditions in the time domain is not a straightforward task [see Nieuwenhof and Coyette (2001) for some steps toward this goal], so that the constant frequency assumption is usually adopted (e.g., see Takemoto et al, 2010). On the other hand, the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition in Eq.…”
Section: The Wave Equation For Vocal Tract Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%