2014
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.2425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of High-Risk Philadelphia Chromosome–Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Adults According to Early Cytologic Response and Minimal Residual Disease After Consolidation Assessed by Flow Cytometry: Final Results of the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 Trial

Abstract: Prognosis for Ph-negative HR-ALL in adolescents and adults with good early response to induction and low flow-MRD levels after consolidation is quite favorable when allo-HSCT is avoided. In this study, the pattern of MRD clearance was the only prognostic factor for DFS and OS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
178
4
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
178
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In adult ALL, MRD response has been evaluated at various time points using different techniques and threshold cutoffs. [16][17][18]20,49 Good MRD response was generally defined as an MRD level of ,10 23 to 10 24 between weeks 5 and 10 and/or MRD level of ,10 24 or not detectable between weeks 11 and 17. For logistical reasons, an earlier time point is more convenient for risk-oriented SCT decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In adult ALL, MRD response has been evaluated at various time points using different techniques and threshold cutoffs. [16][17][18]20,49 Good MRD response was generally defined as an MRD level of ,10 23 to 10 24 between weeks 5 and 10 and/or MRD level of ,10 24 or not detectable between weeks 11 and 17. For logistical reasons, an earlier time point is more convenient for risk-oriented SCT decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Conversely, no superiority of SCT over chemotherapy was observed in patients with a poor early cytologic/MRD response in the Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología (PETHEMA) ALL-AR-03 trial, a result that could be hampered by a lower 5-year DFS after allogeneic transplant (32%) than expected in ALL in CR1. 20 We also investigated the role of SCT in patient subsets defined by newly described oncogenetic markers. In BCP-ALL patients, the presence of poor-prognosis IKZF1 gene deletions was also predictive of a positive SCT effect but was strongly related to poor early MRD response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Patients with standard-risk ALL were treated with pediatric-based chemotherapy, 18 whereas patients with high-risk ALL received chemotherapy with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). 17,19 Since 2002, patients with Ph-positive ALL have received chemotherapy and imatinib upfront, and these have been followed by HSCT in patients younger than 55 years. 20 Analysis of CNAs DNA samples from BM or peripheral blood with a minimal proportion of blasts of 30% (stored at 12 Spanish centers) were processed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30] Interestingly, the achievement of MR5 significantly affected the 2-year HRFS rate of subjects that did not receive allo-HCT, but not that of subjects that received allo-HCT. It was encouraging to find that, among subjects that achieved MR5, the 2-year HRFS rate was similar between those that did not receive allo-HCT (64%) and those that received allo-HCT (78%).…”
Section: 221mentioning
confidence: 99%