2010
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of hospital wastewater effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis

Abstract: Considerable concern exists regarding the appearance and effects of trace and ultra trace pollutants in the aquatic environment. In this context, it is necessary to identify relevant hot spot wastewater - such as hospital wastewater - and to implement specific wastewater treatment solutions. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology seems to be a suitable pre-treatment approach for the subsequent advanced treatment by high pressure membrane systems such as nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO). This paper is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results on the efficiency of such advanced technologies for the treatment of hospital wastewaters can be found in Pinnekamp et al (2009) andBeier et al (2010).…”
Section: Results Of Wastewater Treatment In the Mbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results on the efficiency of such advanced technologies for the treatment of hospital wastewaters can be found in Pinnekamp et al (2009) andBeier et al (2010).…”
Section: Results Of Wastewater Treatment In the Mbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiency of cyclophosphamide removal by reverse osmosis membrane was much higher than that by nanofiltration membrane [27]. This finding was confirmed in the treatment of hospital effluent that contained multiple targeted pharmaceutical compounds [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Ceramic UF (300 kDa) also removed 97.7% of hydrocarbons and 98.4% of turbidity in real bilge wastewater . For the treatment of wastewater containing pharmaceuticals, the removal rate of chemical oxygen demand (COD) for commercial RO was higher than 98% . Even if some membrane processes such as MBR with acclimated specific biomass could treat a hospital effluent with more than a 99.6% codeine removal, the previous membrane processes (UF and RO) increase the concentration of the pollution, and, thus, reduce the cost of ultimate waste treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%