2015
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1029916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of invasive candidiasis: between guidelines and daily clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Heimann et al (2015) supported this finding; their study showed that the mean overall direct treatment costs per patient treated with an echinocandin to be significantly higher than fluconazole, the main contributor being that the echinocandin treated patients were unwell and had longer ICU stays. This is contrary to the findings from Tagliaferri and Menichetti (2015) who found that the echinocandins reduced the overall in-hospital costs compared to fluconazole, and Reboli et al (2011) who concluded that anidulafungin versus fluconazole in ICU patients resulted in a reduction in total IC related costs due to the decreased length of stay.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The study by Heimann et al (2015) supported this finding; their study showed that the mean overall direct treatment costs per patient treated with an echinocandin to be significantly higher than fluconazole, the main contributor being that the echinocandin treated patients were unwell and had longer ICU stays. This is contrary to the findings from Tagliaferri and Menichetti (2015) who found that the echinocandins reduced the overall in-hospital costs compared to fluconazole, and Reboli et al (2011) who concluded that anidulafungin versus fluconazole in ICU patients resulted in a reduction in total IC related costs due to the decreased length of stay.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Candida albicans is an asexual opportunistic fungus that causes infections in immunocompromised and debilitated individuals[ 1 ]. Azole drugs are widely used in clinical practice having a good antibacterial power and low side effects[ 2 ]. Unfortunately, widespread uses of azole drugs have led to the rapid development of drug resistance which hampers the efficacy of current treatments for invasive mycoses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the risk of high toxicity (nephrotoxicity), amphotericin B is no more considered as an option in the treatment. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B diminish the nephrotoxic effect, but are significantly more expensive than the well‐tolerated fluconazole and more toxic than echinocandins, hence its application is considered only in specific situations . As fluconazole is inexpensive and readily available worldwide, it is the most frequently prescribed triazole to treat Candida infections .…”
Section: Global Challenges In Treatment Of Candida Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid formulations of amphotericin B diminish the nephrotoxic effect, but are significantly more expensive than the well-tolerated fluconazole and more toxic than echinocandins, hence its application is considered only in specific situations. [15] As fluconazole is inexpensive and readily available worldwide, it is the most frequently prescribed triazole to treat Candida infections. [16] However, voriconazole is more efficient than fluconazole, but considering the high therapeutic cost it is prescribed only when the infective Candida strain is fluconazole-resistant.…”
Section: Limitations In Clinical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%