2009
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2009.763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of landfill leachate in a bench scale MBR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the parameter in this study are akin to those obtained from Soluos 2 and Soluos 3 landfills in Lagos, which ranged between 26.3 to 36.30 mg/L and 7.98 to 8.77 mg/L respectively (Salami and Susu, 2019), and Aba-Eku landfill in Ibadan, which ranged between 98.01mg/L to 134.01mg/L (Aromolaran et al, 2019). Although its concentration is low when compared with results (exceeding 1000mg/L) obtained elsewhere (Wichitsathian et al, 2004;Robinson, 2007;Visvanathan et al, 2007;Aloui et al, 2009;Hasar et al, 2009;Svojitka et al, 2009;Puszczało et al, 2010;Chiemchaisri et al, 2011), the need for treatment of the leachate cannot be overemphasized. This is because NH 4 -N has been identified as a priority parameter responsible for the toxicity of LFL and could have harmful effect even as an air pollutant upon its volatilization from the leachate when it exceeds 0.50 mg/l (Cameron and Koch, 1980;USEPA, 1984USEPA, , 1989.…”
Section: Characterization Of Landfill Leachatessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The values of the parameter in this study are akin to those obtained from Soluos 2 and Soluos 3 landfills in Lagos, which ranged between 26.3 to 36.30 mg/L and 7.98 to 8.77 mg/L respectively (Salami and Susu, 2019), and Aba-Eku landfill in Ibadan, which ranged between 98.01mg/L to 134.01mg/L (Aromolaran et al, 2019). Although its concentration is low when compared with results (exceeding 1000mg/L) obtained elsewhere (Wichitsathian et al, 2004;Robinson, 2007;Visvanathan et al, 2007;Aloui et al, 2009;Hasar et al, 2009;Svojitka et al, 2009;Puszczało et al, 2010;Chiemchaisri et al, 2011), the need for treatment of the leachate cannot be overemphasized. This is because NH 4 -N has been identified as a priority parameter responsible for the toxicity of LFL and could have harmful effect even as an air pollutant upon its volatilization from the leachate when it exceeds 0.50 mg/l (Cameron and Koch, 1980;USEPA, 1984USEPA, , 1989.…”
Section: Characterization Of Landfill Leachatessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Membranes bioreactors also enable high removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD), low production of excess sludge and allow high concentrations of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), and water reclamation. Membrane bioreactor technology has recently attracted extraordinary attention because of the advantages over conventional activated sludge process, the growing demand for water reclamation, more stringent emission standards and steady decline in the cost of the membrane [5][6][7][8][9]. In addition, MBR technology also have a very good quality effluent, higher load ume, good disinfection ability, reduced footprint and sewage production, improved nitrification and process flexibility towards changes in the influent [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaching is the major route through which soluble contaminants are released into the environment upon contact with water. This results in potential risk to human and environmental health [9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%