2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-2009-1222310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Large and Giant Residual and Recurrent Vestibular Schwannomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some surgeons suggest subtotal removal of recurrent tumor as it offers better functional preservation of facial nerve (15,21,37). However, gross total removal with successful preservation of facial nerve function in both previously resected and irradiated tumors has been described (6,11,13,14,16,19,20,23,25,28,39). In our series, total removal could be achieved in 10 patients (66.7%) of group A and in 3 patients (60.0%) of group B. Preservation of preoperative facial nerve function was achieved in 50.0% of patients of group A after total resection and in 66.7% of patients in group B.…”
Section: Technical Considerations and Intraoperative Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some surgeons suggest subtotal removal of recurrent tumor as it offers better functional preservation of facial nerve (15,21,37). However, gross total removal with successful preservation of facial nerve function in both previously resected and irradiated tumors has been described (6,11,13,14,16,19,20,23,25,28,39). In our series, total removal could be achieved in 10 patients (66.7%) of group A and in 3 patients (60.0%) of group B. Preservation of preoperative facial nerve function was achieved in 50.0% of patients of group A after total resection and in 66.7% of patients in group B.…”
Section: Technical Considerations and Intraoperative Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%