2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Linear Mandibular Fractures Using a Single 2.0-mm AO Locking Reconstruction Plate: Is a Second Plate Necessary?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This improves the stability of the construct, which decreases the gap strain and the mechanical susceptibility to infection that occurs when adequate stabilization is no longer guaranteed. [8]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This improves the stability of the construct, which decreases the gap strain and the mechanical susceptibility to infection that occurs when adequate stabilization is no longer guaranteed. [8]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the drawbacks associated with the use of compression plates or miniplates,[8] reported their clinical experience with the use of a single 2.0-mm locking reconstruction plate at the inferior border of the mandible to treat linear non-comminuted mandibular fractures since the 2003, launch in Switzerland of a new internal AO low profile 2.0-mm locking system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirkpatrick and coworkers showed that locking reconstruction plates facilitate the management of complicated fractures, but postoperative infections cannot be entirely eliminated (Kirkpatrick et al, 2003). In 45 patients with 74 linear noncomminuted mandibular fractures reduced with a single AO 2.0-mm locking reconstruction plate Scolozzi et al (2009) found sound bone healing with no major complications. Two plates were often used in the presented study because comminuted fractures also were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was in agreement with Gerlak et al (14) as no infection has been developed along the study follow up periods as they used the miniplates osteosynthesis and regard to the teeth within the line of the fracture was firmly retained. In the present study, single miniplate was used in the compression area of fracture accompanied by the arch bar placed as a tension band maintained for 5 weeks for its superior advantages including; maximize the advantages of an ORIF technique, more reliable, minimized implanted material, cost effective and decreasing postoperative complications without affecting the stability of the fractured segments as reported by several researchers (15)(16) . It is difficult to calculate the extent to which a reduction of the total amount of titanium used will decrease deposition of metal ions in the peripheral organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%