2016
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s90913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with anti-VEGF agents: retrospective analysis of 5-year outcomes

Abstract: PurposeTo evaluate the 5-year results obtained in clinical practice in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with anti-VEGF agents.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients with nAMD who initiated anti-VEGF treatment before October 2009. We collected data regarding visual and anatomical outcomes.ResultsA total of 278 patients met the selection criteria. The mean number of intravitreal injections was 5.7 in the first year and 3.7 in the fifth year. A positive m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an absolute visual loss became evident in the total number of eyes, their separation based on baseline VA led to interesting findings: the better BCVA at baseline, the more letters were lost after 7years. Our results were concordant with those of other authors as well as the UK Age-Related Macular Degeneration EMR Users Group, who previously described similar effects [23,24]. "Ceiling" is referred to as the limited potential gain in vision simply due to a relatively good BCVA at the baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although an absolute visual loss became evident in the total number of eyes, their separation based on baseline VA led to interesting findings: the better BCVA at baseline, the more letters were lost after 7years. Our results were concordant with those of other authors as well as the UK Age-Related Macular Degeneration EMR Users Group, who previously described similar effects [23,24]. "Ceiling" is referred to as the limited potential gain in vision simply due to a relatively good BCVA at the baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Younger age as a prediction factor for better response to ranibizumab treatment is in-line with the Korean PMS study (10) and several post hoc analyses of pivotal trials and studies assessing predictors of response to ranibizumab (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Findings from the current study also strengthen the observation regarding baseline VA being an important factor in predicting visual outcome, consistent with the Korean PMS study, (10) the study by Pedrosa et al (2016) (36), the LUMIERE study (20), and the global LUMINOUS study (11,22). These ndings could be explained by the "ceiling effect" whereby patients with higher baseline VA have limited potential to gain more letters, while those with lower baseline VA have little possibility for further loss of vision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…TER demonstrated better visual outcomes in comparison to the PRN regimen of anti-VEGF therapy ( 20 ). Recently, several retrospective studies evaluated the efficacy of the TER regimen of anti-VEGF therapy under real-world conditions ( 21 23 ). Whereas the studies by Pedrosa et al ( 21 ) and Gillies et al ( 22 ) included different treatment regimens in their analysis, the study by Mrejen et al ( 23 ) evaluated only the TER regimen, but followed only 54 patients for 5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%