2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13036-017-0085-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of old landfill leachate with high ammonium content using aerobic granular sludge

Abstract: BackgroundAerobic granular sludge has become an attractive alternative to the conventional activated sludge due to its high settling velocity, compact structure, and higher tolerance to toxic substances and adverse conditions. Aerobic granular sludge process has been studied intensively in the treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater. However, information on leachate treatment using aerobic granular sludge is very limited.MethodsThis study investigated the treatment performance of old landfill leachate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were comparable with those achieved in previous studies with simulated and real industrial wastewaters [17,[29][30][31], landfill leachates [11,32] and different anaerobic digestates: in particular, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska et al [14] reported SVI 5 values within the range of 25-30 mL g TSS −1 in a GSBR treating diluted and undiluted anaerobic digester supernatant at different cycle lengths (6, 8, 12 h); Świątczak et al [6] reported SVI of about 50 mL g MLSS −1…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…were comparable with those achieved in previous studies with simulated and real industrial wastewaters [17,[29][30][31], landfill leachates [11,32] and different anaerobic digestates: in particular, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska et al [14] reported SVI 5 values within the range of 25-30 mL g TSS −1 in a GSBR treating diluted and undiluted anaerobic digester supernatant at different cycle lengths (6, 8, 12 h); Świątczak et al [6] reported SVI of about 50 mL g MLSS −1…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The decrease in the ammonium nitrogen removal rate with the lengthening of the GSBR working cycle (r = 1.00) and a resulting decrease in the load of organics indicates that ammonium nitrogen removal was due to the activity of heterotrophic microorganisms. The ammonium removal rates were over two times and seven times greater than the rates observed during the treatment of landfill leachate with a low COD/N ratio in granular sludge batch reactors and activated sludge batch reactors, respectively [31]. Regardless of the length of the cycle, complete removal of ammonium nitrogen was observed after approximately 6 h of the cycle.…”
Section: Gsbr Operationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although the successful treatment of landfill leachate by both conventional and granular AS has been reported in the literature [11][12][13], the number of reports that stress the negative impact of this effluent on the sludge performance is definitely higher [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Because the AS process often cannot achieve an effective reduction of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total nitrogen in effluents contaminated with landfill leachate, this technology should be further improved in order to cope with the complex mixture of compounds as well as the fluctuations in the environmental factors associated with this type of wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%