Treatment of pesticide intermediate industrial wastewater using different advanced treatment processes

Akinapally, Sindhu; Dheeravath, Bhagawan; Panga, Kiran Kumar; Saranga, Vijaya Krishna; Golla, Shankaraiah; Himabindu, V.; Srinivasulu, S.

doi:10.1007/s40899-021-00551-7

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rotary evaporators can remove the solvent efficiently from samples through evaporation. Haaz et al and Akinapally et al used rotary evaporators to remove COD from process wastewater and pesticide intermediate industrial wastewater, respectively [31,32], while Stall et al employed a rotary evaporator for extracting polyphosphates in activated sludge collected from wastewater treatment plants [33]. Wang et al applied a rotary evaporator to simulate humidification-dehumidification process for concentrating biogas slurry [34].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization and Modeling of Ammonia Nitrogen Removal from High Strength Synthetic Wastewater Using Vacuum Thermal Stripping

Reza

Chen

2021

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Waste streams with high ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentrations are very commonly produced due to human intervention and often end up in waterbodies with effluent discharge. The removal of NH3-N from wastewater is therefore of utmost importance to alleviate water quality issues including eutrophication and fouling. In the present study, vacuum thermal stripping of NH3-N from high strength synthetic wastewater was conducted using a rotary evaporator and the process was optimized and modeled using response surface methodology (RSM) and RSM–artificial neural network (ANN) approaches. RSM was first employed to evaluate the process performance using three independent variables, namely pH, temperature (°C) and stripping time (min), and the optimal conditions for NH3-N removal (response) were determined. Later, the obtained data from the designed experiments of RSM were used to train the ANN for predicting the responses. NH3-N removal was found to be 97.84 ± 1.86% under the optimal conditions (pH: 9.6, temperature: 65.5 °C, and stripping time: 59.6 min) and was in good agreement with the values predicted by RSM and RSM–ANN models. A statistical comparison between the models revealed the better predictability of RSM–ANN than that of the RSM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt comparing the RSM and RSM–ANN in vacuum thermal stripping of NH3-N from wastewater. The findings of this study can therefore be useful in designing and carrying out the vacuum thermal stripping process for efficient removal of NH3-N from wastewater under different operating conditions.

show abstract