2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of pig farm effluents by ultrafiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other causes are also responsible of this effect, like polarization, adsorption, pore blocking, etc. Similar slight or void influence of the feed flow rate on J v at higher pressure was observed during the ultrafiltration of pig farm effluents [10] and the nanofiltration of dyes [19].…”
Section: Influence Of Operating Conditions On the Permeate Fluxsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, other causes are also responsible of this effect, like polarization, adsorption, pore blocking, etc. Similar slight or void influence of the feed flow rate on J v at higher pressure was observed during the ultrafiltration of pig farm effluents [10] and the nanofiltration of dyes [19].…”
Section: Influence Of Operating Conditions On the Permeate Fluxsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…5. As it is seen for TMP = 3 bar, J v increases when the tangential velocity is increased, probably due to an increase of the turbulence at the membrane interface, which removes some of the accumulated components in the cake layer by hydrodynamical forces, and thus reducing the cake and polarization layer [10]. However, when a TMP higher than 4 bar was applied, an increase in the tangential velocity above 2 m s −1 did not improve membrane fluxes, probably because under these conditions, the permeate flux was limited by the dense structure of the deposited fouling layer [16].…”
Section: Influence Of Operating Conditions On the Permeate Fluxmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This initial decline in J v is a direct consequence of the fouling effect that occurs in the membrane, which in the present case, focused on the NF of model compounds dissolved in natural waters, is low to moderate. However, the fouling effect is more significant in the NF of industrial wastewaters [12,15,16] with much higher pollutant contents. As similar decay curves of J v were obtained for the remaining experiments not shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%