2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of sewage sludge in a thermophilic membrane reactor (TMR) with alternate aeration cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, their extension to sludge treatment has been explored [77]. In effect, an aerobic thermophilic biomass is characterized by a lower yield, hence a decrease in specific sludge production (down to 0.02 kg SSV/kg COD removed ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, their extension to sludge treatment has been explored [77]. In effect, an aerobic thermophilic biomass is characterized by a lower yield, hence a decrease in specific sludge production (down to 0.02 kg SSV/kg COD removed ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They represent proper indicators of the current scenario, although the scientific literature is proposing some promising alternatives. For instance, the authors are currently carrying out a study aimed at recovering nutrients from sludge (Collivignarelli et al, 2015a) by running a thermophilic membrane reactor; this process has led to promising results indeed in liquid wastes treatment (Bertanza et al, 2010a;Collivignarelli et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sewage sludge treated in a thermophilic membrane reactor at pilot scale (1 m 3 ) with alternate aeration cycles using a two-phase cycle that involved the "startup phase" and "regime phase" gave removal efficiencies of 64% for volatile solids and 57% for total COD with an average hydraulic retention time of 20 days, an organic loading rate of about 1.4-1.8 kg COD m -3/d and aeration cycles alternating every four hours (Collivignarelli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%