2020
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Ready for Prime Time?

Abstract: The current standard of care for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is observation until there is end-organ involvement. With newer and more effective treatments available, a question that is increasingly asked is whether early intervention in patients with SMM will alter the natural history of their disease. Herein, we review the evolving definition of SMM and risk stratification models. We discuss evidence supporting early intervention for SMM—both as a preventative strategy to delay progression and as an int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, MM is a model of transformation from premalignant asymptomatic conditions (monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance -MGUS- and smouldering myeloma -smMM-) into active stages when disease-associated symptoms such as anemia, hypercalcemia, renal impairment, or bone lesions may appear. The study of this evolution has led to the clinical evaluation of the concept of early intervention for these asymptomatic patients [ 2 ]. Prognosis is another field of research in MM that started with the use of clinical parameters such as albumin or β2 microglobulin, continued with the discovery of molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities conferring adverse prognosis, and more recently, dynamic markers like the evaluation of the measurable residual disease (MRD) have been incorporated to guide treatment decisions.…”
Section: Multiple Myeloma and The Bone Marrow Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, MM is a model of transformation from premalignant asymptomatic conditions (monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance -MGUS- and smouldering myeloma -smMM-) into active stages when disease-associated symptoms such as anemia, hypercalcemia, renal impairment, or bone lesions may appear. The study of this evolution has led to the clinical evaluation of the concept of early intervention for these asymptomatic patients [ 2 ]. Prognosis is another field of research in MM that started with the use of clinical parameters such as albumin or β2 microglobulin, continued with the discovery of molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities conferring adverse prognosis, and more recently, dynamic markers like the evaluation of the measurable residual disease (MRD) have been incorporated to guide treatment decisions.…”
Section: Multiple Myeloma and The Bone Marrow Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a median follow-up of 43.3 months, 63% of patients remained MRD-negative, with estimated 4-year PFS and OS rates of 71% and 100%, respectively. A subsequent phase II study in 52 high-risk SMM patients, assessed eight cycles of KRd followed by 2 years of lenalidomide maintenance (KRd-R) [ 184 ]. After a median follow-up of 27.3 months, the ORR was 100%; only 10% of patients had developed MM after 5 years.…”
Section: Bone Marrow Modulating Agents: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the long clinical course and follow-up, there is a need for reliable biomarkers, in addition to secreted monoclonal proteins, that can track disease burden and bone disease, in order to inform the timing and intensity of treatment. Such markers may additionally capture a subset of smouldering MM (SMM) patients that may benefit from earlier treatment [3,4] and refine monitoring frequency in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) [5]. Currently, serum paraprotein and free light chains are widely used for disease monitoring; however, utility is limited in non-paraprotein-secreting MM, and although they track the secretory capacity of a plasma cell clone, that feature can change over the course of disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%