1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.1993.tb01013.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of umbilical hernias in foals with Elastrator rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,5,6 The primary disadvantage of hernial clamping is the risk of incorporating gut into the clamp and inadequate fibrosis of the abdominal wall defect. The procedure should be done under general anesthesia with the foal in dorsal recumbency.…”
Section: Alternative Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5,6 The primary disadvantage of hernial clamping is the risk of incorporating gut into the clamp and inadequate fibrosis of the abdominal wall defect. The procedure should be done under general anesthesia with the foal in dorsal recumbency.…”
Section: Alternative Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservative treatment proposed by some authors, such as Pollicino in swine and Greenwood and others in foals, have attempted a non-surgical reduction using Elastrator umbilical forceps. This method may be used in the case of umbilical hernias with a diameter of less than 5 cm, which is fully reducible and in the absence of a history of umbilical infection [ 27 , 28 ]. In the past, daily digital exploration of the hernial port was practiced with the aim of irritating the umbilical ring and causing the formation of adhesions to reduce the width of the hernial port.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%