1987
DOI: 10.1016/0011-9164(87)80013-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of uranium containing effluents with reverse osmosis process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it generates concentrated liquid wastes that must be disposed of. Other methods for removing uranium include chemical clarification that uses ferric sulfate or aluminum sulfate [5], precipitation [6], membrane filtration [7], and reverse osmosis [8]. The major limitation for these methods is the proper disposal of the resulting sludge that contains high levels of the metal and other contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it generates concentrated liquid wastes that must be disposed of. Other methods for removing uranium include chemical clarification that uses ferric sulfate or aluminum sulfate [5], precipitation [6], membrane filtration [7], and reverse osmosis [8]. The major limitation for these methods is the proper disposal of the resulting sludge that contains high levels of the metal and other contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this method generates concentrated liquid wastes that must be appropriately disposed, thus, increasing the overall operational costs [12]. Membrane methods, such as nanofiltration [13] and reverse osmosis, are also efficient for uranium removal, removing the carbonate uranium complexes by more than 90%, but their application requires experienced personnel and their use is quite expensive, especially when designed for treatment of relatively small volumes of water [9,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods, for instance, chemical precipitation (9), evaporation (10), reverse osmosis (11), and solvent extraction (12) have been proposed for separation and uptake of REEs. Most of them share problems of miscellaneous steps, huge energy consumption, and high cost of equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%