2020
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of venous thromboembolism in elderly patients in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Abstract: differ between younger and older patients with acute VTE. 7,8 Furthermore, evidence regarding the optimal treatment of VTE in the elderly, including first-choice anticoagulant agents and duration of anticoagulation, is limited, because elderly patients have been underrepresented in clinical trials. 7,9 As a consequence, the 2016 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines do not make specific recommendations for elderly patients and only acknowledge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The group size was relatively small, but VTE despite thromboprophylaxis is infrequent [4]. Additionally, our results cannot be applied to other groups of patients such as the elderly, those with cancer, or recent cardiovascular events, known to affect fibrin clot features [13][14][15]. No laboratory investigations were performed during follow-up and some variables including fibrinogen may change over time, but nonetheless, the data at baseline have a prognostic value in this clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The group size was relatively small, but VTE despite thromboprophylaxis is infrequent [4]. Additionally, our results cannot be applied to other groups of patients such as the elderly, those with cancer, or recent cardiovascular events, known to affect fibrin clot features [13][14][15]. No laboratory investigations were performed during follow-up and some variables including fibrinogen may change over time, but nonetheless, the data at baseline have a prognostic value in this clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Calibration of the CHAP model may vary between patients receiving VKA and DOACs because DOACs are potentially associated with a lower risk of major bleeding during extended anticoagulation compared with VKAs, 38 and, consequently, patients receiving DOACs who were classified at high risk of bleeding may not have an annual bleeding risk >2.5%. However, point estimates of hazard ratios for those at high bleeding risk (vs those not at high risk) and major bleeding rates in high-risk patients were similar for VKAs (3.9 major bleeding events per 100 person-years) and DOACs (4.9 major bleeding events per 100 person-years), and evidence from randomized trials does not suggest an interaction in terms of bleeding risk between type of anticoagulant and creatinine, 39 hemoglobin, 17 age, 39, 40 and antiplatelet therapy. 41 Second, fatal bleeding was rare, and, consequently, estimates of case-fatality rates of major bleeding according to subgroups of predicted bleeding risk were imprecise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…43 , 44 In meta-analyses of clinical trials, DOACs reduced the risk of MB by up to 60% compared with VKAs in older persons with VTE, at least during the first 3 months of treatment. 20 , 50 , 51 MB may also have a lower case-fatality in patients treated with DOACs. 52 Thus, our results based on data from the pre-DOAC era may not extrapolable to older patients with VTE who are treated with DOACs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%