2022
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2110069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment options for neonatal infections in the post-cefotaxime era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst there could be pharmaceutical formulations able to chelate out calcium, this may be physiologically harmful to the eye. In the case of new-borns up to 28 days old, ceftriaxone is contraindicated due to the potential need for calcium treatment, which can be required in premature infants and those with impaired bilirubin binding [148][149][150][151]. Thus, although further investigations may be able to circumvent these issues with ceftriaxone, alternatives are needed.…”
Section: Log Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst there could be pharmaceutical formulations able to chelate out calcium, this may be physiologically harmful to the eye. In the case of new-borns up to 28 days old, ceftriaxone is contraindicated due to the potential need for calcium treatment, which can be required in premature infants and those with impaired bilirubin binding [148][149][150][151]. Thus, although further investigations may be able to circumvent these issues with ceftriaxone, alternatives are needed.…”
Section: Log Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%