2015
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Outcomes of Corticosteroid Injection and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as Two Primary Therapeutic Methods for Acute Plantar Fasciitis: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
43
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are numerous advantages to using non‐invasive therapeutic devices, their efficacy has not yet been maximized. For example, a recent study comparing shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injection found corticosteroids significantly reduced pain in patients with plantar fasciitis . Although corticosteroids are commonly used as anti‐inflammatory pain reducers in orthopaedics, their safety is controversial, and they do not play a role in tissue healing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are numerous advantages to using non‐invasive therapeutic devices, their efficacy has not yet been maximized. For example, a recent study comparing shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injection found corticosteroids significantly reduced pain in patients with plantar fasciitis . Although corticosteroids are commonly used as anti‐inflammatory pain reducers in orthopaedics, their safety is controversial, and they do not play a role in tissue healing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a recent study comparing shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injection found corticosteroids significantly reduced pain in patients with plantar fasciitis. 4 Although corticosteroids are commonly used as anti-inflammatory pain reducers in orthopaedics, their safety is controversial, and they do not play a role in tissue healing. Therefore, the investigation of alternative non-invasive therapeutic technologies is desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that a higher accuracy of injection under US guidance could be the reason for better results in the guided group in comparison with the blinded group (15). Corticosteroid injection is one of the most effective and common applicable methods in the treatment of tendinopathies10 being used in many types of tendon inflammations and pathological conditions (17)(18)(19)(20). On the other hand, the use of US technology in musculoskeletal interventions has gained more interest in recent years (1,11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74,75 The level of evidence is low, and no recent studies have reported a significant clinical benefit of this method in PF treatment. [76][77][78] An elevated BMI is an established risk factor for PF. 79 Weight loss may, therefore, represent an interesting approach to resolve PF.…”
Section: Casts Devices and Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%