2019
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Outcomes of Patients Switching From an Injectable Drug to Bedaquiline During Short Standardized Treatment for Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in Mozambique

Abstract: Bedaquiline was recommended by the World Health Organization as the preferred option in treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) with long regimens. However, no recommendation was given for the short MDR-TB regimen. Data from our small cohort of patients who switched from injectable drug to bedaquiline suggest that a bedaquiline-based short regimen is effective and safe.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Niger, the combination of monthly audiometry with replacement of Km by linezolid was effective in preventing severe hearing loss [ 6 ]. Another study shows that bedaquiline can also be used to replace Km [ 23 ]. However, bedaquiline resistance is acquired in up to 5% of patients [ 24 , 25 ], which is used as an argument to save this drug for patients with FQ-resistant-TB [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Niger, the combination of monthly audiometry with replacement of Km by linezolid was effective in preventing severe hearing loss [ 6 ]. Another study shows that bedaquiline can also be used to replace Km [ 23 ]. However, bedaquiline resistance is acquired in up to 5% of patients [ 24 , 25 ], which is used as an argument to save this drug for patients with FQ-resistant-TB [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Updated WHO guidelines for RR/MDR-TB conditionally recommend a shorter bedaquiline containing regimen for patients without previous exposure to second-line treatment and without fluoroquinolone resistance. [25][25][28]Outcomes of substituting bedaquiline for the injectable agent when toxicity occurred are promising [36]. Further operational research using SSRs incorporating more efficacious drugs including bedaquiline and linezolid, and removing drugs with high rates of resistance globally including ethionamide, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, would yield important real-world results whilst waiting for ongoing randomised trials to finish [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from two conference abstracts from Belarus in 2016 [65,66], up to April 2019 no results on the frequency and type of AEs reported through aDSM had been published. However, there are a limited number of reports on prospectively collected data on AEs in patients treated with ND&R in programmatic settings [14,17,18,23,[67][68][69][70]. These eight reports describe partially overlapping cohorts ( ND&R: new drugs and regimens; SAE: serious adverse event; AE: adverse event; MSF: Médecins Sans Frontières; NR: not reported; MDR: multidrug-resistant; TB: tuberculosis; STR: shorter (9-month) treatment regimen; Km: kanamycin; Bdq: bedaquiline; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine transaminase; Dlm: delamanid; ERS: European Respiratory Society; WHO: World Health Organization; PiH: Partners in Health; XDR: extensively drug-resistant; Lzd: linezolid; Cfz: clofazimine; QTcF: Fridericia-corrected QT interval; FQ-R: fluoroquinolone resistance; SLID-R: second-line injectable drug resistance; ADR: adverse drug reaction; Lfx: levofloxacin; BL: baseline; Mer: meropenem; PAS: para-aminosalicylic acid; Cm: capreomycin; Cs: cycloserine; Mfx HD : high-dose moxifloxacin (dose not specified in paper); Imp: imipenem; GI: gastrointestinal.…”
Section: Why Active Drug Safety Monitoring?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one report describes this for Dlm [68], two reports for two cohorts receiving both Bdq and Dlm [23,70], and one report describes the safety and efficacy of a modified STR in which kanamycin was replaced with Bdq [67]. The safety data obtained from these reports are summarised in table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%