2021
DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment outcomes of peri-articular steroid injection for patients with work-related sacroiliac joint pain and lumbar para-spinal muscle strain

Abstract: Objectives: Evaluating treatment outcomes of local corticosteroid injections for work-related lower back pain (LBP) as the current evidence for the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine guidelines is considered insufficient to recommend this practice. Material and Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study involving the patients who were treated with peri-articular and lower lumbar corticosteroid injections for work-related LBP at their occupational medicine clinic. Results: Six… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, among the included articles, a combined approach Fig. 4 Statistical results and funnel plot was tested only in steroid injections or human grow hormone injections [15,[30][31][32] case series, confirming the promising results of targeting both joint and periarticular tissues. To deliver the injected product to the target area, the literature also suggests the use of a radiological guidance, being a blind injection effective only in 22% of the procedures [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In fact, among the included articles, a combined approach Fig. 4 Statistical results and funnel plot was tested only in steroid injections or human grow hormone injections [15,[30][31][32] case series, confirming the promising results of targeting both joint and periarticular tissues. To deliver the injected product to the target area, the literature also suggests the use of a radiological guidance, being a blind injection effective only in 22% of the procedures [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%