2017
DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2017.1341012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment recommendation and parameter estimation under single-index contrast function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that β t may not be identifiable and our focus here is to identify boldx A rather than to estimate β t. Model (1) actually accommodates a variety of parametric and semiparametric, models whose primary objective is to estimate the optimal treatment selection rule, such as the linear regression model, 14,35 the single-index model, 7,44 and the semiparametric single-index model. 5 Note that the difference of the conditional distribution functions of the outcomes under two different treatment categories, that is, F false( y falsefalse| x , T = t 1 false) F false( y falsefalse| x , T = t 2 false) = F 0 false( y falsefalse| β t 1 boldx A I false( T = t 1 false) , boldx I false) F 0 false( y falsefalse| β t 2 boldx A I false( T = t 2 false) , boldx I false), implicitly yields the set of predictive variables as defined in …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that β t may not be identifiable and our focus here is to identify boldx A rather than to estimate β t. Model (1) actually accommodates a variety of parametric and semiparametric, models whose primary objective is to estimate the optimal treatment selection rule, such as the linear regression model, 14,35 the single-index model, 7,44 and the semiparametric single-index model. 5 Note that the difference of the conditional distribution functions of the outcomes under two different treatment categories, that is, F false( y falsefalse| x , T = t 1 false) F false( y falsefalse| x , T = t 2 false) = F 0 false( y falsefalse| β t 1 boldx A I false( T = t 1 false) , boldx I false) F 0 false( y falsefalse| β t 2 boldx A I false( T = t 2 false) , boldx I false), implicitly yields the set of predictive variables as defined in …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the following three models adopted by Xiong et al 7 and Siriwardhana et al, 44 where x is multivariate normal random vector with zero mean vector and covariance matrix normalΣ = false( σ i j ) .1em p × p given by σ i j = 0.8 falsefalse| i j falsefalse| if both i , j A or I, otherwise σ i j = 0.1, T is discrete uniform random variable on falsefalse{ 1 , , K falsefalse}, and ϵ is a normal variable with distribution N false( 0 , 2 false) which is independent to both x and T. Clearly, model 1 is linear and models 2 and 3 are non-linear.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For decades, causal inference has been widely used in many fields, such as biology, psychology and economics, etc. Most of the current research is based on univariate treatment (binary treatment, multivalued treatment, continuous treatment) (Imai and Ratkovic (2014); Zhu et al (2015); Fong et al (2018); Zubizarreta (2015); Chan et al (2016); Xiong et al (2017); Yiu and Su (2018); Dong et al (2021); Hsu et al (2020)). Some research are focused on multivariate categorical treatments, such as factorial designs and conjoint analysis to estimate the main or interaction effect of any combination level of treatments (Hainmueller et al (2014); Dasgupta et al (2015)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%