2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment selection using prototyping in latent-space with application to depression treatment

Abstract: Machine-assisted treatment selection commonly follows one of two paradigms: a fully personalized paradigm which ignores any possible clustering of patients; or a sub-grouping paradigm which ignores personal differences within the identified groups. While both paradigms have shown promising results, each of them suffers from important limitations. In this article, we propose a novel deep learning-based treatment selection approach that is shown to strike a balance between the two paradigms using latent-space pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this strategy, the authors achieved a remission rate of 35.5% over random treatment allocation, achieving better results when compared to the existing state-of-the-art method (i.e. CFRnet, Vulcan, case-based recommender (CBR)) ( 227 ).…”
Section: From Current Standards To System Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 96%
“…With this strategy, the authors achieved a remission rate of 35.5% over random treatment allocation, achieving better results when compared to the existing state-of-the-art method (i.e. CFRnet, Vulcan, case-based recommender (CBR)) ( 227 ).…”
Section: From Current Standards To System Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Extensive feasibility and ease of use testing of this CDSS was previously performed in both simulation center and in vivo feasibility studies [16][17][18][19] . With in silico testing demonstrating that the AI component should help improve remission rates 6, [20][21][22] and in vivo testing demonstrating that the platform was feasible, easy to use and likely safe [16][17][18][19] the current study was undertaken with the main objective of determining the e cacy of the platform in improving depression treatment outcomes in patients with moderate to severe depression, as well as to assess platform safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, in contrast to modeling predictions under the naturalistic, observational setting, modeling for interventional recommendations requires additional consideration of potential confounds that could arise from non-random treatment assignments. While a handful of studies have modeled prediction of antidepressant response using data specifically collected for research such as brain imaging or EEG, sample sizes have been typically modest and these approaches can be costly and difficult to scale 9 42 . Ideally, a clinically useful model would enable accurate prediction of antidepressant response, comparative predicted response for alternative treatment choices, and control for potential confounding – in particular, confounding by indication – that is, pretreatment factors associated with both the propensity to choose an antidepressant and treatment response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%