2000
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2000.12069006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Sensitivity of the PE Form of the Social Skills Rating Scales: Implications for Test Construction Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gresham & Elliott (1990) report adequate internal consistency reliability, test‐retest reliability and evidence of content and criterion‐related ability for the SRSS standardization sample, which included 20% African‐American children. The alpha in this study for total skills was 0.78, which was similar to that obtained for the standardization sample (Meier 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Gresham & Elliott (1990) report adequate internal consistency reliability, test‐retest reliability and evidence of content and criterion‐related ability for the SRSS standardization sample, which included 20% African‐American children. The alpha in this study for total skills was 0.78, which was similar to that obtained for the standardization sample (Meier 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Gresham and Elliott (1990) report adequate internal consistency reliability, adequate test-retest reliability, and evidence of content and criterion-related ability for the SSRS standardization sample, which included 20% African American children. Alphas in this study were .63 (Cooperation), .72 (Self-Control), .68 (Assertion), and .74 (Responsibility); these alphas are similar to those obtained for the standardization sample (Meier, 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Because these analyses are exploratory in nature, and the expected effects at the level of an individual item are likely to be small, an α level of .10 was set to detect statistically significant change (cf. Meier, 2000). As shown in Table 2, 12 of 19 items evidenced statistically significant change in one or both subsamples: controls temper, pays attention to speakers, stays out of trouble, communicates clearly, shares thinking, feels depressed, behaves differently, acts impulsively, fights with others, family members fight, lies or cheats, and gets failing grades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The IISR approach to test construction and evaluation attempts to identify effects at the item level, likely to be small in size, through the use of multiple statistical tests. This runs counter to the statistical philosophy of minimizing the effects of chance through the use of a Bonferroni or similar adjustment (Meier, 2000). One solution to these differing approaches is to consider initial IISR studies as exploratory in nature, using a less stringent α.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%