2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment strategies and subsequent changes in the patient-reported quality-of-life among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying these factors might substantially affect anticipated QOL benefits of various AF therapies and can also help to identify potential challenges in adherence to therapy and self-care (see section 7.2). 79,80 5. Screening and Opportunistic AF Detection…”
Section: Risk Factor Role In Af Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying these factors might substantially affect anticipated QOL benefits of various AF therapies and can also help to identify potential challenges in adherence to therapy and self-care (see section 7.2). 79,80 5. Screening and Opportunistic AF Detection…”
Section: Risk Factor Role In Af Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anticoagulation schedule does not include antiplatelet agents-such as Aspirin® (acetylsalicylic acid) and Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate), β-adrenergic blockers or calcium. Calcium channel blockers help in the rate of ventricular control, improve symptoms and have a low risk profile, but have low efficacy when it comes to reducing AF episodes [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The globally accepted threshold for old age is 65 years and widely available papers on rhythm control in the elderly describe patients aged over 65 or 70 years [3][4][5].While the mean age of patients in our previous publications on antazoline reached almost 70 years, for the purpose of this analysis we adapted 75 years as a threshold of old age [9,14,16].This age threshold is analogous to the age criterion for active monitoring for AF in clinical guidelines and consistent with recent studies on oral anticoagulation in the elderly [1,18]. Patients ≥ 75 years old comprised the study group and patients <75 years old comprised the control group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the initiation of oral anticoagulation is pretty clear in those patients, less is known about the optimal long-term strategy regarding rhythm or rate control [1]. Due to several factors like frailty or multimorbidity the rate control strategy seems to be prevalent in this population [1,[3][4][5]. Most concerns seem to be related to lower effectiveness and a higher risk of complications of typical rhythm control therapies in older patients [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%