2021
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s306345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: From “All-Comers” to “Personalized” Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, darolutamide was different in molecular structure from apalutamide and enzalutamide, leading to a different pharmaceutical outcome 3 . Although the treatment‐mediated manipulations on AR signaling initially show excellent anticancer effects, most tumors eventually recur and become fatal 2 . Several molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular resistance to AR‐signaling targeting therapies have been reported, including AR amplification and overexpression, AR mutations, AR co‐regulators, AR activation by intracellular signal transduction pathways, and AR variants 4–6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, darolutamide was different in molecular structure from apalutamide and enzalutamide, leading to a different pharmaceutical outcome 3 . Although the treatment‐mediated manipulations on AR signaling initially show excellent anticancer effects, most tumors eventually recur and become fatal 2 . Several molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular resistance to AR‐signaling targeting therapies have been reported, including AR amplification and overexpression, AR mutations, AR co‐regulators, AR activation by intracellular signal transduction pathways, and AR variants 4–6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Recently, novel AR pathway inhibitors such as abiraterone, apalutamide, and enzalutamide in combination with androgen‐deprivation therapy have been proven to prolong survival for patients with metastatic hormone‐naïve prostate cancer. 2 In addition to apalutamide and enzalutamide, another second‐generation antiandrogen darolutamide has been shown to improve metastasis‐free survival and overall survival in nonmetastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer. 3 Notably, darolutamide was different in molecular structure from apalutamide and enzalutamide, leading to a different pharmaceutical outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…showed a possible treatment strategy for patients with mCSPC as per cancer and patient characteristics, as well as patient preference. 19 However, to date, the prognostic factors of upfront ARAT agents for Japanese patients with mCSPC have not been widely introduced into real‐world clinical practice. Collectively, further prognostication should be carried out to provide more precise information regarding the treatment of Japanese patients with mCSPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Editorial Comment to Effect of upfront combination therapy on the overall survival of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study Upfront combination therapy using docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) prolongs radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in phase III clinical trials, and it has become a standard treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). 1 However, the survival benefit by upfront combination therapy for mHSPC needs to be confirmed in real-world data among Japanese patients. Recently, Naiki et al 2 have investigated the outcome between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with bicalutamide and upfront abiraterone for high-risk mHSPC among Japanese patients with their characteristics balanced, and have reported superior PFS by upfront abiraterone.…”
Section: Editorial Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upfront combination therapy using docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) prolongs radiographic progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in phase III clinical trials, and it has become a standard treatment for metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) 1 . However, the survival benefit by upfront combination therapy for mHSPC needs to be confirmed in real‐world data among Japanese patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%